The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

F-16AJ is easier to model than XF-2A probably
they always go the easy way

1 Like

And the addition of the F-16AJ is wrong. The XF-2A would have fulfilled the same role, at the same BR; and would even be a real plane on top of that!

7 Likes

Its not diffirent st all it didnt exist, we should of got a n f2 or or so not a false jet

If this is photo shopped ngl it’s a pretty good photo shop

IR missiles still can be locked from far away rather than MMW seekers which have limited range

modern arh missiles are only able to acquire targets from 10km (fox3)
these mmw waves requires more power and have much more limited battery in the missiles. hence they have limited range

but that still just one picture and doesn’t show what aircraft even carry
Other example is Brimstone test fire by Apache we have full video display it even Brimstone never use by apache

Op did so why should i

https://roe.ru/production/aviatsionnaya-tekhnika-i-vooruzhenie-vozdushno-kosmicheskikh-sil/aviatsionnye-sredstva-porazheniya/upravlyaemye-sredstva-porazheniya/aviatsionnye-upravlyaemye-rakety-obshchego-naznacheniya-klassa-vozdukh-poverkhnost/kh-38mle/?theme=theme-lightblue

1 Like

The “No” vote is also there for me due to no option “Let’s wait for confirmed information before deciding.”

Cause that’s my stance at the end of the day, all I want is confirmed information one way or the other.

The only stake I have here is air sim EC convoys.

1 Like

At this point i only see prove of MT as fake missile more than it existence.

1 Like

Ty, also it Shows either innert or mockup of the KH38MT i still don’t think it’s really much consistant proof in My opinion it’s like eurosatory tanks being mockups, or not functional like the Kf-51 u “crewless turret” it’s just a non functional turret, a good way of checking is finding patents, but like i said before unless the missile can be seen actively working it can be taken either as mockup or non functional at the moment

1 Like

image
God gave you eyes. Use them.
For how long are you gonna beat around the bush?
Kh-38mt is not real AS WELL as there’s no need for it in the game.
It solves 0 problems, patches 0 gaps.
More than that - this missile is a major balancing issue.
Why should it stay? - There’s not a single reason for that.

1 Like

You know this thought experiment about a trillion monkeys with typewriters?
I’m not going to elaborate.
Here’s kf-51 shooting.

2 Likes

Wrong kf51

This one The KF51U is not functional

copyImage

I think you massively misunderstood sausage overall.

He pretty much said the KH38MT is fake/ not proven to work and so on

That wasn’t the photo shopped image that is the original image it was photo shopped with the seeker head from the MAKS 2017 and posted in here by csla now you can’t see it cause it was community flagged.

The Abrams shell is one of the better ones at top tier rn, plus tank gameplay is relatively balanced as is. Very few reasons as to why give the Americans a better shell.

Was denied by Gaijin a while ago bc of the ability to lock and kill targets through smoke. As to why they would be overpowered idk.

The mechanic for ARH missiles is in the works as we speak. Implementing the HARM without any code doesn’t exactly help the situation.

I have said it once before and I will say it again: Top tier will forever be an open beta test and until everything has been added and everything is balanced accordingly it will always be unbalanced. That it even came to situation like this with the Kh38, Mavericks, Mig27 and Ka50 spam is indeed Gaijins fault.

2 Likes

I’m pointing out the hypocrisy. Adding the A4 would be game breaking, such as the KH38MT

The KH38MT flies so fast smoke isn’t even effective. Not really a point to be made there.

1 Like

I think you should drink less.

1 Like

I can send you that photoshop in PM if you want.