The Mi-28A flew in Sweden with all systems operational.
Not comparable to this Kh-38MT situation.
just looked and 29te has 5 times more zoom than 65d
It was test flown. That’s it
ok so for it to be relevant you need to show that Kh-38MT was test fired
1 Like
How good was the thermal sight on the KH29 ?
manipulator final boss
that is still much more usable
It doesn’t even have thermals.
1 Like
Your eyes are built differently I’d say.
That thing can bully 9.7 - 10.7 lobbies with ease but I guess you don’t care.
yes and? you cant identify a tank from 5km out with 65d, with the kh29 with map knowledge you can find targets from 8-10km pretty easily
it literally cant
a7d, a7e, and a7k are all much better due to either using 65b, having a targeting pod with agm62 or both
Okay Senoír double standard
Maybe not if you are playing on a mobile phone.
I just played 2 games or so with the Kurnass2000 and it’s busted af, yet nobody complains.
Finding targets with thermals is way easier, even with less zoom.
1 Like
so a plane with a high zoom optical camera to let you find targets?
Who even does that lmao, you use the seeker.
Which the camera also doesn’t have thermals btw.
Yes it can.
US is dominant in CAS role in multiple BR ranges but you don’t moan about it, weird.
3 Likes
I dont think you all understand how terrible of a platform the A10 is
there are props that out run and out climb it while it doesnt have a particularly good ordinance load for the BR
but we should probably get back on topic
where you have still yet to provide any evidence that Kh-38MT exists
You can make a case but your need to make a case, not just state something you want.
You need to bring links and arguments.
Oh it’s so terrible people don’t use it super often to orbital strike with GBUs. GREAT example!