can you provide photographic evidence of you going outside(aka outdoors, not in a building)
If there is no actual proof of the KH38MT existing then it should either be removed or gaijin should open the doors for other nations to get proposed armaments.
I personally am fine with the KH38MT staying, but I am not fine with the apparent double standard of Russia getting a weapon which may only be a mockup while other nations require extensive proof of their weapons existing for them to be added.
Even when other nations get their weapons added half the time they aren’t accurate to documentation, (im looking at you mr Stinger).
5 Likes
I would have to post the same photo twice.
10 Likes
lmao
Well, they reject even things that the players positively prove with primary sources, saying “our consultant says the source is wrong” etc
Good luck asking them to remove something “because there isn’t enough evidence” …
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Progress as of today:
With over 3000 messages we’ve recently passes 1000 votes in favour of it being removed, with 83% of the over 1260 votes being in favour of it’s removal. In the week since it’s initial posting we have found no further evidence of it existing. In fact we’ve found reason to believe some of the initial evidence is out of date, and does not actually support the missile being in service.
11 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
The poll is essentially useless since its a popularity contest. End of the day gaijin is the one who says what stays and what goes, we can only provide evidence to support why they are incorrect. As of now nothing has been done to swing the pendulum in either direction. Thats the balanced take.
On another note I took interest and decided to take a look at the model of the KH-38MT in game. As we know when viewed in a test drive or live match seeker domes become a lot less opaque. It shows a striking resemblance to the seeker used on the KH-38ME mockup from 2017 down to the yaw gimbal on the seeker etc. So thats definitely what they think is the IR sensor, I just wonder what supporting documentation they have at this point.
2 Likes
~1051(1050.78) vote yes tho which is more than any poll before as far as i know (note: as far as i know)
the thing is
gaijin dosent care
im sure if its 5k something then maybe
or content creator rant but i doubt
ahhhh
already happend just saying
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Only polls gaijin care about are the ones they make themselves as they are the ones who shout they are doing it from the roof tops to get as large a sample as possible and thus as fair a sample as possible. Hence why its dumb to continuously bring it up.
right
Hey there is 6 of us playing naval! Take it back!
1 Like
you and your 2nd, 3rd, 4th. 5th and 6th account
The thing is, this thread’s basis for removal of the missile is lack of evidence it existed, which is something Gaijin doesn’t care about until something realistic can take it’s place.
There’s like a dozen of other examples which is why I doubt KH-38MT is going anywhere.
It looks like a cheap way to quickly remove any opposition from the looks of things.
its a lose lose im guessing