The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

[Silversting]

You will never get proof from gaijin lmao

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

There is even a video somewhere, where a KH38 (i don’t think they say which one) was used.

so it doesn’t even say it was a kh38mt and it could have been anything else

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@MythicPi

Its funny you say that cuz atm that seems to be just about exactly what happened (drawings in a brochure, not a comic book, but close enough)

So you are saying KH38 is not real ?

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

So you are saying KH38 is not real ?

were talking about kh38mt specifically

[MythicPi]

Theres multiple videos and they’re all Kh-38ML’s. They cant be posted here tho due to forum rules.

[Ghost_of_TelAviv]

@S-200VE_Vega

so it doesn’t even say it was a kh38mt and it could have been anything else

It was KH38, whatever variant. So yes, the KH38 does exist.
Now does the IR seeker ? Maybe or maybe not.

[dotSHINI]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

the missile does exist and was used.

Dont make claims u cant prove.
If KH 38MT was used show us clearly

[MythicPi]

Nobody has said the Kh-38ML doesnt exist…

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

It was KH38, whatever variant. So yes, the KH38 does exist.
Now does the IR seeker ? Maybe or maybe not.

the topic isn’t “all kh-38 does not exist” but kh-38mt

[dotSHINI]

@Ghost_of_TelAviv

And since they use IR seekers for other missiles, it’s more than plausible that they have a variant of this one too.

Existence of one thing dowsnr prove for another variant.
Between kh29 and lmur and the kh 38mt would be worlds apart in capsbility

[ARK_BOI]

if people said KH-38 in here the probably mean MT version since the topic name specifically said
“KH-38MT” already

[ARK_BOI]

Yeah when I mention KH-38 here sometimes I’m too lazy to put MT behind it too since topic name it about MT do i need to put MT behind in everytime?

[Necronomica]

@Silversting

Yes. But this seeker for this missile exists, since it was offered for export.

Things have been and continue to be offered for export before they even exist.
As i compared here:

The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

Yes, all of those are to everyone’s knowledge mockups and not functional. Here is an image of Eurofighter with IRIS-T and METEOR missiles from 2001: [image] Meteors first test fire was done in 2006, before then there was no proof of the missile even functioning. Despite that it had already sold thousands of missiles years before first test fire. IRIS-T had it’s first test fire in 2003. The missiles presence on a showroom floor tells you absolute…

@Silversting

You wouldn’t even have known about the existence of the name Kh-38MT if it hadn’t been shown, but they showed it, they even showed its seeker on a mock-up

What we see is some unknown seeker of unknown functionality on a mockup missile. There has so far been no proof provided that a IR seeker has been implemented into a functional KH-38 and test fired.

[S-200VE_Vega]

they should replace kh-38mt with what we have evidence for, so only a seeker with a mockup and potentially no explosive load

[S-200VE_Vega]

we should let this thread breathe and wait until someone wants to bring real evidence here. this arguing is rather pointless

[S-200VE_Vega]

yall going offtopic into kh38ml vs brimstones
doesn’t matter. kh38mt should be outed, not real.

[ShOt_MaCkEr]

Coming by and telling the truth for like 5th time.
KH-38MT is not real

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Surbaissemaxxing this thread has gone to sh*t

[dotSHINI]

@Stona_WT @magazine2 @Smin1080p_WT

Would be so much easier when there would be an official gajin statement that they are researching it etc. Anything.
The whole back and for about a missle nobody finds sth about and is a major reason top tier is ruined, gets annoying

[AlvisWisla]

There is a lot of yapping without posting anything new about Kh-38MT either being cancelled or being at least tested.