I get that, but still absence of evidence is definitely not evidence of absence
I literally posted instances where assertions where made it does not exist, do they have evidence it does not exist?
I’m gonna quote myself
Look I have no evidence that the seekers are French, but France did provide a lot of Thermal technology to the Russians, so I still assert that if Hammer gets nerfed, the Kh-38MT should get the same nerf if it does not get removed
And that is just declarations by you.
If it it is proven to exist i personaly would have no problem with it. This is the case with many here.
In the first place the thread wouldnt exist in that case in the first place.
That has nothing to do with russia. The F-16AJ got just as much flak
Its what u are doing all the time
That is why we’d like to see what evidence gaijin has that the missile is real, since nobody in nearly 3000 comments here have been able to provide anything that was not already discussed in the original post.
Is this really that hard to understand?
Using your own logic to show you how dumb it is and thats the best you can come up?
But Gaijin won’t respond, because it’s literally a zero sum game for them. That’s the unfortunate truth
I would argue it could exist, slap an IR seeker on it and allow it lock IR signatures.
What we can almost 100% gaurantee is the missile will not function like it does in game.
It will not act like it does capable of hitting moving targets and it will not have the detection range it has in game.
here is an extract from KBM the designers and producers of the LMUR one of the few “man in the loop guided systems”
*“One of the important features of the missile is a high degree of protection against interference and electronic warfare. To date, in combat conditions, there have been no cases of suppression of the control channel of a light multi-purpose guided missile (LMUR “Product 305”) during a special operation,” the state corporation added. *
The missile operates in several modes, including a “fire-and-forget” capability. In this mode, the missile’s homing system locks onto the target while still mounted on the helicopter, allowing it to work autonomously after launch. This feature improves operational flexibility and reduces the risk to the crew.
*In remote control mode, the missile is launched towards specific coordinates and initially flies in inertial mode. As it nears the target, the homing system activates, transmitting an image to the operator’s screen in the helicopter cockpit. The operator then identifies the target and guides the missile to it. *
In a third mode, the missile is fired inertially toward the approximate coordinates of the target. As it nears the target, the homing system provides the operator with a live image of the terrain. The operator identifies the target, and the missile adjusts its trajectory to ensure a direct hit.strong text
In every mode this missile cannot determine what it is looking at, it cannot hit a moving target without operators input. Why would anyone think KH-38MT could track and hit a moving tank at 20km away
LMUR is one of Russias most advanced and newest missiles
If thats your opinion, why even waste all of our time arguing here?
Because I am also curious about the seeker?
Welp, this is unfortunate
So you concede that there is no concrete evidence of the missiles existence beyond the mockup stage currently available, and have instead decided to waste all our time by demanding I provide something that cannot possibly be provided (evidence of non-existence) instead of just trying to find what can be provided and has been requested (evidence of existence).
Cool.
They will need to. It has become ro big of a matter
KH-38MT is as real as the Ho-Ri, only a mockup
not an actually produced thing
source? Belkan Ministry of Skill Issue
Hey man, I just pointed out you set yourself up to proving a negative. Sorry if I offended you in any way
He didnt. Becsuse thats not a thing in the first place in this case
Not how that works at all
The burden of proof lies on the one trying to prove the existence of something.
As Necronomica pointed earlier, proving non-existence is hard and in some cases impossible.
Also, it opens the door for so much worst things in the future. Everyone running around with a model could claim they made something that works, and it could be added in the game on the basis that “you can’t prove it doesn’t exist”
True, but that doesn’t really strengthen your case. It results in the same as there is no such thing as evidence of absence as you cannot prove non-existence.
Which AGAIN is why it’s the default and not something you can prove. It’s something we fall to because there is no other choice.
That is perfectly reasonable as you are making a statement within a premise. a statement can hold true within a premise but be false outside of it.
So with premise A then statement B holds true, but without premise A then statement B wouldn’t logically hold.
As previously recommended in this thread by me:
gaijin: cant prove a IR guided bomb can track tanks, despite community showing proof it can
also gaijin: Kh-38MT exists, and lets make ASM’s track tanks for some funny reason
Source: Belkan Ministry of Skill Issue (im just goofing here pls dont smite)
Its annoying to have to go over the same stupid argument multiple times a day with multiple different people. You can’t set yourself up to prove a negative, since its impossible to do in the first place, which is why I requested evidence of a positive in the first place.
Im not wasting any more time on this, if you cant figure it out, thats your own problem.
2796 messages and no undeniable evidence yet
Rather telling