The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

[Alpharius11348]

you got any sources for that?

would probably be helpful to know if confirmed

[Alpharius11348]

do you know when/where this picture was taken?

[Anonymous4245]

No clue as to when, 1st posted Jan 31/Feb1 this year. I DMed the poster on Twitter for extra info, no reply yet

As for where? ERA Technopolis Expo

[Thenighthunter]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[LegitRussianBias]

@meki98

It’s Easy Russian vehicle’s are nerfed by documentation and buffed by feelings

Nuh uh. I could show you tonnes of proposed buffs and such for Russian vehicles that have been rejected.

[ARK_BOI]

@meki98

Russian vehicle’s are nerfed by documentation

You sure?
I think even with documentation they still rarely get nerf

@meki98

Non Russian vehicle’s are nerfed by feelings and buffed by documentation*

Not even true for example we have lot of documents that DM53 have anti era now been years now still not even exist or Brimstone that lack FnF even there are sht tons of documents back it up.

[Segment]

I’ve seen this name applied to the Kh-38 on Russian forums. For example, the Kh-29 is definitely called Izdelie 63.

[Segment]

Don’t shake so much, bro.

[Thenighthunter]

Oh trust me I won’t be shaking with even anticipation for evidence proving your statement.

[putcheeseonit]

@coffee_can-psn

cope and seethe

only one here seething is you lmao

[Thenighthunter]

I agree the product code is interesting. But I don’t see any correlation to the KH-38.

[Anonymous4245]

We don’t positively know that though

[Temeraire]

So this its the seeker for M variant of the Lmur? What are the upgrade or what it does??. And what its 65MT?

@Anonymous4245

I’m really confused by the Izd 65 internal code for it the most. Is it the Kh-38?

Could it be X-MD-E?..

Edit: NVM X-MD-E its suppose to be Izd 85.

[Caernarvon02]

500 more messages

Still no proof that the missile is real and not a marketing lie

[Anonymous4245]

Kh-MD-E looks like it has the seeker in a fairing on the bottom though

[Alpharius11348]

ive looked into it a bit and seen something about Izdelie 63, 63m, and 64 referring to 3 different Kh-29 variants

but the only thing I could find on Izdelie 65 was here which isnt a great source but says its referring to Mig-9 but also gives Izdelie 63 as a Mig-1 variant

Zavod 39 (TsKB-) designations

[Xeno_quaza]

What even is this argument suppose to be?

[Alpharius11348]

I am still really confused though because why would they remove Kh-38MTE from their brochures and website if they are showing off its seeker at an expo

[3xKZeus]

@3xKZeus

“random guy in the internet claims A, just isnt trustworthy.” thats the issue with i said before and im pretty aware of it, and even if i post something of an answer, anyone and rightfully so, can say im making stuff up.

I also agree with you on other points, but makes no sense in removing it from the game, the solutions needs to be another one.

Aswell as said before, in the brochure there was the missile (that means nothing), but imagine that if im a factory that has propaganda about something i cant provide to potentional interested buyers due to the current… Operation… that is making me go domestic i would change to the most cost effective solution with proven results, and where my most expensive thing, the targeting pod, can be re-used and thats why theres usage in a fair volume of the KH-38ML. Overall the most cost effective solution.

" Its highly questionable to actual capability and specs the missle would have. Nobody can proof its meaned for targeted moveable tanks and not similar to the AASMR static positions. " Agreed, the mockup tho, has the IR seeker with wide lenses.

One also cannot compare the different seeker heads of the AGM-65 family, as you cannot compare the KH-29T seeker to the KH-38 seekers due to being diferent stages.
There is also another issue that i like to call, USSR/RUSSIAN Budget Engineering. The aproach to common issues is viewed in different ways and therefore solutions, less dependence on the electronic part of the thing and more hardware inclined.

This being said, you cannot prove its existence or absence.

P.S. i know my answer doesnt add something conclusive, but well… also might have english error.

@Alpharius11348 sorry for all quote still havent gotten used to this new forum. Thats the explanation.

[Alpharius11348]

I see that but why would they still be marketing the MLE if that was the case and they couldnt market stuff with current events

additional it seems to have been removed from brochures before the current events that we cant really talk about

I understand ML is more economic and that is why I doubt it ever completed development and additionally I believe with current events it is unlikely many resources are being invested in developing a less economic missile