No no, there wasn’t a single one MT version posted here, even a mockup (though I don’t exactly remember that one without the seeker, but it doesn’t worth any attention anyway)
Of what was that the mock up then
No matter if its a mock up of an KH38MT or MTE.
As a mock up it doesnt prove anything about functionality
2 Likes
its wild that suddenly the rarden was overperforming when we got a tank it was decent on and wasnt stuck on the warrior
1 Like
I think the UHT should get the LFK NG (mini IRIS-T) missiles cus there were a couple mock-ups, and a few of them were even put next to a UHT once too!
))))
5 Likes
If we go by the logic of the Kh38MT, yes
yeah honestly if all it takes is a mock up weapon next to the vic I think we should go down this path frfr
/j
Ironically, the LFK NG was at least test fired, unlike the 38MT ))))
2 Likes
would give a reason to play the german tiger over the french one at least
I was specifically saying how the F-16AJ in game is nothing like what it actually should be based on the proposal and the prototype the proposal was a modification from, and how gaijin basically entirely made up the F-16AJ as we have it in game.
5 Likes
Hope you have a lot of time then.
1 Like
We also have ARMIGER which was allegedly test fired
2300 messages and we still don’t know if the Kh-38MT really exists
7 Likes
like aydanl said 2300 messages still no proof of the missiles existence so unless gaijin wants to show us this evidence no one else can find that proves they are real I dont think they should be in the game
2 Likes
Apparently some people really like to point out that there is also no definitive proof of the missile not existing, as if that is in anyway an argument of equal value.
3 Likes
literally the same as people who say “ah but there isn’t any proof big foot ISN’T real”
9 Likes
Gaijin Sekret documents combined with trust me comrade
Meanwhile the poor f111c is still missing half it’s loadout despite Pictures proving it could use all hard points
5 Likes
It is knot da Sekret document, Comrade, it is the Sekrad dokumant. An da Ef-111 ees a pore burd ei noe.
I mean theoretically if I accuse someone of being a thief, how is he supposed to prove he never stole a thing in his life?
Some people just dont get it.
I tought this is the EN forum and not the Breton forum ))))