Its almost as if the T is a designation for prototype, You know, Like “Object” for the Russians, Who have loads of single built vehicles that never saw use too.
Go on and tell us what tanks they got that didn’t get built.
Its almost as if the T is a designation for prototype, You know, Like “Object” for the Russians, Who have loads of single built vehicles that never saw use too.
Go on and tell us what tanks they got that didn’t get built.
means its a prototype body but doesnt have a seeker, if it did there would be another letter between M and E
could still be a mockup though
Kh-38ME is probably the IIR version. we havent seen a single kh38 mockup/inert piece with kh38mte written
its a production model, unlike what nato stans believe, the rivets and screws arent supposed to be visible lol
ME is just a general term. Line a base template. When you add different letters like L,T, A (and their corresponding modifications) it becomes a specific version.
Kh-38ME is not and refers to the family of missiles
maybe thats because it doesnt exist…
the one image with what looks like a functional IIR seeker says ME
all the mockups with a IIR looking seeker has ME
you will be waiting a long time
in usage Kh-38ME has been used to refer to all variants in all sources that use it when referring to a specific seeker type they all add an additional letter to indicate which
id still believe ME is for the IIR, as all of ME protos hint towards the IIR seeker
do you have evidence of this to quell this disagreement?
usually, mockups do not have real systems inside.
seeker looks more than a mockup to me
oh lemme show you something
Unless I’m blind, I did not find anything like that. Feel free to send it in PM’s
If you mean this, which was posted already on the thread (as already pointed out by Devil09), it’s most likely a laser guided one
):<
apples to oranges
my point is, it may look real, but mockup missiles do not carry real equipment.
that seeker is far from a mockup.
yes it may not have a booster or a warhead, but surely a seeker