The Issue of F-16I’s BR Placement

Do remember that the Sufa is heavily overperforming as it is 1400kg too light

It isnt
He is a very good player and loom that in other plane he perfirm better

The engine is underperforming so not rly

1100 kg too light, not 1400

2 Likes

oops mb

By how much?

Idk exacly but ik its on high speeds and its not a small thing
Like it should be on par with f16c

They have almost the same top speed at low or high altitude, the sufa has a tiny advantage on speed and a bit more acceleration at slow speed. Naturally everything else is worse than the F-16C

1 Like

What are you even trying to say?? There are no 14.0 worthy MiG-29s ingame and it’ll stay that way until either massive decompression takes place or we got the MiG-35 in the current BR placements.

Accelertion on high speed is much better on f16c
Even the f16c barak with the weaker engine is better

a littile offtopic
The F-16I and F-15I (and overall even the barks) using LITENING III and not 2
maybe there is no big diffrence between 2 and 3 but for the F-15I raams is downside because the Lantrin just worser then LITENING

1 Like

I did a test with a mach 1 climb to around 5600m and flew in a straight line, they crossed the same line of the map at almost the same speed. The sufa was going 1800kph and the f16c 1790 or so.

Also I doubt that the f16c barack is faster then the f16c block50. I can test it again later but the barack has a weaker engine with lower slightly lower TWR while both have the same drag values

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Not quite there yet

Bvr alt is around 10000m or 8000m at min

Also i said that even the f16c barak is better then the sufa not better then the american f16c

You don’t have time to climb to those and cruise at over mach 1.5 with the f16. You might climb up there to launch your first missiles and then start defending and loosing altitude. After that first part of the match being at under contrail altitude is better. If you are a rafale or Eurofighter you can keep the altitude but with anything else is too risky

Sorry I misread. But the sufa accelerates a bit faster than the f16c from what I’ve noticed (small difference), and the block40 is slower than both

But u do need to do so or u will be on a big energy disadvantge

yeah f-16i still slightly worse than blk 10, forgot about that plane

1 Like

No one better than him to describe what is to play with this thing the WORD is FRUSTRATING thats all ITS HORRENDOUSLY FRUSTRATING since i researched it and playing matchs after matchs trying to spade it ITS TOTAL FRUSTRATION i didnt feel like this before while playing a jet, i have a lot of jets the meta ones and the non meta ones and this one is the worst.

but later you see this while the devs are saying “WE CANT INTRODUCE PYTHON- 4 TO THE F-16I BECAUSE ITS A MATTER OF BALANCE” WHAT?! are you sure about that? HEYYY BOYSS THEY CARE ABOUT BALANCE LETS GOOO!!!

ABOUT WHAT BALANCE ARE WE TALKING ABOUT HUH? honestly the double standards are insane.

UPDATE: i need to post this again edited without the 2 “BAD” Words because it seems that it was removed for that. i didnt use any offensive word directed to someone in particular not even the devs, not even a player, not even a CM, the only thing i said directed to someone is for the devs when i said they “care about balance lets goo” with a little bit of sarcasm, genuine question because honestly am confused this can be seriously categorized as offensive, hateful, inappropriate? if thats the case what a good way of taking feedback from the community.

leaving this aside i hope that the sufa situation by the next major update changes because am not playing it until it gets what it deserves am not here to suffer playing the game am here to enjoy the game and right now am not enjoying it.

2 Likes