Just ignore that troll,you won’t get anything useful from it.
F-111F IRL use APQ-169 and ALR-62. none of them appear in game, even in text. the model of radar anf rwr in preview is all wrong, and Gaijin ignored issues about it
6 Likes
@ex3333 People are not trolls for wanting F-111 to be accurate.
Edited cause F-111 haters false-flagged my post.
The only one being anti-F-111 here is you.
2 Likes
@Morvran
So wanting F-111 to have its correct radar is anti-F-111?
That’s clearly bait. You can’t be serious…
@Morvran
No, I state that @ex3333 is anti-F-111 for attacking everyone that wants it to be as accurate as possible.
And yes, I came in saying that the radar is placeholder and that F-111F should get its correct radar.
“Wanting F-111F to get its correct radar means you don’t want it to get its correct radar.” - Morvran and ex3333.
Thanks for proving that I want F-111F to get its correct systems.
Just ignore that troll.Not worthy waste time on it.
I reported a issue about ALR-2002 on Australian F-111C week ago
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/AVxIuBlbFRUM
3 Likes
We can all see his post, please don’t post disinformation when we can all see his post.
And he once again is claiming that wanting F-111C to get its correct RWR makes you bad things.
Reminder that although this is publicly available on websites (for some reason), what you have just posted is still not official declassified. Please remove it when you get the chance.
My guy… what?
4 Likes
He called me malicious just cause I want F-111C and F-111F to be made accurate.
The first person to use the word malicious in this thread was you…
2 Likes
Cause if you quote the actual insult your post gets flagged and removed.
Quoting insults is just as rule-breaking as using the insult.
Alright well this isn’t going anywhere, and it’s also derailing the thread. I would appreciate if everyone here would get back on topic, as arguing about the possibilities of the game isn’t going to change anything like bug reporting and contacting Tech Mods/Devs will.
Currently the F-111F lacks its proper radar and radar modes, that is the subject of this thread and I would not like to see the thread derailed on other subjects.
I also now understand the RWR is also highly inaccurate and can edit the thread to include it in the title and subject post if everyone here would like me too, rather than creating a whole new thread.
Quick poll for this if y’all don’t mind:
- Include F-111F/C RWR Issues in this Thread?
- Create New Thread for F-111F/C RWR Issues?
0
voters
Regardless of the outcome of this poll, given the similarities between the RWR and Radar issue, I see no problem with at the very least discussing both topics in this thread.
If the off topic and arguing continues, I’ll grab a forum mod to clean this thread up. There’s no need to argue in such a way over unnecessary things, such as game limitations, especially when the game is proven to not be limited in such a way. And either way while I bring this subject up for the last time, the radar could be implemented in such ways that it includes all the possible features that are limited by the state of game, such as simply leaving out the radar modes that aren’t yet currently possible to add.
3 Likes
The problem with F-111F is, the latest official manual I have found is classified.
I made a report but it was rejected Community Bug Reporting System
The older manual mention the AN/APQ-144 as air-to-air search and track radar.
That manual I think is not classified.
There are also few other radars for terrain following, for ground search and track, altidude radar.
here is the
equipment listing
of AN/APQ radars.
3 Likes
I think for some reason Gaijin doesn’t want planes/tanks from countries other than the USSR to have true equipment.
I don’t know if this is because of “restricted” documentation or if there are other reasons for this.
Recently my report about the radar in the A-6E TRAM was marked as a duplicate and linked to a report that was written on the old forum. Community Bug Reporting System
The link leads to a page with some message “Sorry, there is a problem
You do not have permission to view this topic.
Error code: 2F173/H”
https://old-forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/569487-fwd-dec102022-222014-a-6e-tram-missing-radar-modes/
and here is the old bug report:
I think TRAM will never get radar. If they spend 2 years wondering whether it had such a radar or not, then something is wrong here.
4 Likes
I just made a report for the F-111F and ALR-62I. At the least the ALR-2002 should be similar to the 62I, so I suggested that as well, but idk how the devs will handle that.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Dxp5aSZuhdFn
Funnily enough, the F-111A we have in game seems to be a modernized one, as it also includes the compass sail receiver which should not be present with the APS-109 RWR, but eh idk… Gaijin has been always a bit inconsistent with in game models and actual intended models, so I suppose it is rather a modelling error, similar I could go on about the F-16 RWRs…
5 Likes
He’s too active here for a simple troll. I think he’s on GJ’s payroll because he defends literally every complaint against GJ from the players.
3 Likes
It’s pretty funny that the documentation on Soviet/Russian equipment often remains classified longer than that of Western counterparts. That doesn’t stop GJ from making things up in the game, giving Soviet equipment and weapons capabilities they never had in real life.