Counterpoint any round instantly knocks you out since that basically already happen, if the armor wasn’t underperforming and the engines were properly modeled so you could move with just 1 id say yes but its just a meh tank in a sea of good tanks. The aiming is still something gaijin needs to re adjust as ive been shot and had my strv 103 permanently shake for the rest of the match
Ngl I’m already running my 103C in 9.3 lineup
I traded it out for the T72, better vehicle for the BR, i just run T72 and the Leo Marksman best vehicles for 9.3, Leo is just a better 9030fin but without any downsides lol
Its stll pissing me off that we got the ugly and unbalanced Leopard Marksman instead of T-55 Marksman…
We could get the ITPSV 90 and the Leo Marksman :p
Pls snail if britain can get multiple same BR SPAA other nations should too
As long as we get a Challenger Marksman (or the G6 Marksman), you can get another Marksman as well :)
You guys have 3 spaa chill lmao
103C runs amazingly on sim-sized maps… just now I had a match on Maginot with reasonable 6 kills and no deaths cause enemy stayed semi-passive for the whole game. I highly recommend you give it a try once more. Maybe when you up your crews a lil bit. You must have Tank Driving and Targeting skills to max, preferably Rangefinding and Leadership too.
Excuse me, we have two at 8.3 (one being over-BR’d to hell because it has APDS) and one at 8.7
Yeah i don’t play sim that much lol, all i get are Aral Sea, Sun city, and cargo port…
Sorry my bad you have 3 Tank Destroyers at 8.x, basically the same BR smh
Chi-Ri to 5.7?! Please, oh god, no. Do not put the Chi-Ri in the 5.7 “up tier from your BR here” black hole into 6.7. It already gets basically permanent uptiers to 5.7 as is, being there at base will ruin it.
Why is a King Tiger-sized, Panzer 4-armored Sherman 76mm able to fight actual King Tigers?! Is historical BR placement back? The Chi-Ri fighting 75mm Sherman Jumbos is sad enough as the Jumbo is frontally immune to the Japanese 75mm, so this is quite frankly, a terrible idea. Unless the Chi-Ri goes to 5.3, there will be no further point to using it.
The last Panzer 4 with a turret is 3.7, and yet the Chi-Tos, larger-bodied equivalents, are 4.7. The Chi-Ri, a larger, autoloaded Panzer 4, is .3 above the Chi-Tos, a reasonable difference. Why is there such a disparity between such similar vehicles, if a bit off-topic?
Just… Please, 5.3, not 5.7. I don’t mind a BR nerf if it’s not past 5.3, unless there is some plan to move a lot of vehicles up in BR such that the Chi-Ri being 5.7 isn’t pure suffering.
I definitely don’t want to see Pershing Jumbos or USA T-34s in the Chi-Ri… Or Ferdinands and Jagdtigers, or T-44s and SU-122-54s, or HEATFS launchers like the M50, AUBL/74 or Pbv 501…
tl;dr Chi-Ri to 5.7 is insanity. Please, reconsider! 5.3 would be enough!
I think you meant that you have one at 8.3 and two tank destroyers in disguise at 8.3 and 8.7
I wasnt playing sim. Im talking about large maps that are in regular RB rotation.
Look, it’s not my fault that the APHE round in the 35mm guns is busted as hell, I just want more anti air to defend my team from planes and helis
Nah leave the Marksman alone its doing its job very well without breaking games for others. It just doesnt have the mobility or size to be anywhere Falcon, ZA-35 or even Gepard level.
It would be much better if it got it’s correct ammunition
The HE shells are supposed to be 1005 m/s, not 850 m/s
1 Like
Can Israel get the experimental Magach Marksman while everyone is at it?
1 Like
I’d love them to cap APDS belt on the Falcon to only a handful of rounds like Gepards than move it down to 7.7 or something.
Which is why we should get the ITPSV 90, not like Finland has much in the way of unique vehicles in the TT since gaijin would have to spend more than 5 minutes modeling