Sorry my bad you have 3 Tank Destroyers at 8.x, basically the same BR smh
Chi-Ri to 5.7?! Please, oh god, no. Do not put the Chi-Ri in the 5.7 “up tier from your BR here” black hole into 6.7. It already gets basically permanent uptiers to 5.7 as is, being there at base will ruin it.
Why is a King Tiger-sized, Panzer 4-armored Sherman 76mm able to fight actual King Tigers?! Is historical BR placement back? The Chi-Ri fighting 75mm Sherman Jumbos is sad enough as the Jumbo is frontally immune to the Japanese 75mm, so this is quite frankly, a terrible idea. Unless the Chi-Ri goes to 5.3, there will be no further point to using it.
The last Panzer 4 with a turret is 3.7, and yet the Chi-Tos, larger-bodied equivalents, are 4.7. The Chi-Ri, a larger, autoloaded Panzer 4, is .3 above the Chi-Tos, a reasonable difference. Why is there such a disparity between such similar vehicles, if a bit off-topic?
Just… Please, 5.3, not 5.7. I don’t mind a BR nerf if it’s not past 5.3, unless there is some plan to move a lot of vehicles up in BR such that the Chi-Ri being 5.7 isn’t pure suffering.
I definitely don’t want to see Pershing Jumbos or USA T-34s in the Chi-Ri… Or Ferdinands and Jagdtigers, or T-44s and SU-122-54s, or HEATFS launchers like the M50, AUBL/74 or Pbv 501…
tl;dr Chi-Ri to 5.7 is insanity. Please, reconsider! 5.3 would be enough!
I think you meant that you have one at 8.3 and two tank destroyers in disguise at 8.3 and 8.7
I wasnt playing sim. Im talking about large maps that are in regular RB rotation.
Look, it’s not my fault that the APHE round in the 35mm guns is busted as hell, I just want more anti air to defend my team from planes and helis
Nah leave the Marksman alone its doing its job very well without breaking games for others. It just doesnt have the mobility or size to be anywhere Falcon, ZA-35 or even Gepard level.
It would be much better if it got it’s correct ammunition
The HE shells are supposed to be 1005 m/s, not 850 m/s
1 Like
I’d love them to cap APDS belt on the Falcon to only a handful of rounds like Gepards than move it down to 7.7 or something.
Which is why we should get the ITPSV 90, not like Finland has much in the way of unique vehicles in the TT since gaijin would have to spend more than 5 minutes modeling
YES YESSS
4 Likes
Ye
The Falcon only has a single belt for each gun, so that wouldn’t work
It shouldn’t have APDS to begin with and afaik they didn’t plane to use APDS in the Falcons belts, if any nation had adopted it. Gaijin should just remove the APDS round and lower the BR again so it can be useful as a SPAA.
1 Like
That works too. I just gave a middleground solution cause I know some people would get extremely pissy about losing sabot.
It’s a SPAA, let people get pissy about it not being able to lol-pen MBTs
Looking suspiciously french
You get so little for killing planes so of course people wanna kill tanks
Finnish project with an Egyptian 155 lol
1 Like
I want the M113A2 MK I for like 8.x sweden
3 Likes
Honestly BR’s around 8.0 are ridiculously overfilled with gamebreaking autocannons. Fox, XM800T, ZA-35, Leopard Marksman, XM246, etc. and I cant even imagine how could they balance it without moving them all up.
2 Likes