I think 7.7 would be reasonable considering other low tier LRF HEAT slingers such as M41D, ZTS63, Clovis, etc. but it would most likely get that minor nation tax and end up 8.0.
3 Likes
Also as for the NM116 they shouod have a better engine. There is also the Einar Tambarskjelve with a missing machine gun port and a 400hp engine from Norway
1 Like
Right, you have one more missile than most of the competition.
Is that gonna be a major advantage over the competition? No.
It would be nice to see the Gripen NG/E be able to shine, but (unless we see proper e-war someday) War Thunder isn’t gonna give it much of a chance.
7.7 seems like an ideal spot, it would fit nicely between the Pbv 501 and the Ikv 91
2 Likes
7.7 is lacking and the Veak is so worthless lol. Id just play it at 8.7
8.0 is good
No SPAA makes me not want to play there lol, also STRV 103 aiming is terrible decent tank on the 3 maps that make it fun to play but meh. Too map dependent for my taste
1 Like
Idk man I love 103 and have no issues with it. I usually just run it like a regular MBT no matter the map and it works surprisingly well. Wedge is highly crew lvl dependant so maybe thats why.
My crew is like level 90 lol
Oh well. Meanwhile all of my wedges:
The 103C at 9.0 is truly FPE experience
A lil yeah
Should add the 103C with ceramic armor or the thermal sight
2 Likes
9 would be a decent upgrade from the 6 the current gripen has.
1 Like
The current Gripen loadout holds it back considerably IMO.
1 Like
100%, there’s already a perfect spot for it
2 Likes
I mean, there is a reason why the Gripen C is 13.7 and not 14.0 or 14.3 lol
Not at 9.3 please the 103 armor is already terrible enough
I mean better round (400mm+ pen) + Thermals + LRF + composites + 4 sec reload (as always) would be highly competitive even without >true stabiliser<
I agree. However if it had 9 missiles 14.3 could definitely be justified.