Fokker D.XXIII
1 Like
thanks a lot!!!
Good to see Germany finally getting a counterpart to the GR.4, even if it is a year late.
And maybe we can see the RET.8 get upgraded to a similar standard?
I Sistine what you did there
5 Likes
@Stona_WT, are we going to lose Chieftain 900 even though Orson officially announced the devblog of it?
I still can’t see her in the dev server patch notes.
2 Likes
9.0 😬
That is wild
Chieftain 900 is in the dev server, it is coming, just missing from the patchnotes
Mk.5 + more horsepower, makes sense its 0.3 above
Why?
Its gunna perform almost identically to the Mk10.
Can anyone give me an idea of what map to ban which will have a ~5Km Contrail height following this change?
Im guessing its any map with snow.
And extra armour and extra penetration and LRF
Then at the same BR you got shit like the A1A1 with no armour, lower penetration, no LRF, and only slightly better mobility
Hell, it’s a lower BR than crap like the M48 Super or CM11 or Strv 105
And this is gonna fight unstabilized 8.0s 💀
Crazy Brit glazing by Gaijin
Sorry mate, I simply skipped it somehow (I guess its streamlined shape curved the light so much, that I didn’t notice it!).
Changelog fixed. Thanks for patience!
1 Like
What Extra armour? You mean the 5mm of Structural steel?
Mk10 at 9.0 also has the L23 and LRF.
The only difference of note to the Mk10 is the better engine.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Worse Armour, for a better engine
or Better engine for worse armour
its a fair tradeoff
if the Chieftain Mk.10 had its proper 852ps maybe it would be 9.3, but right now its just 760ps
Besides, Chieftain 900 still very much plays like a chieftain, it is NOTHING like Khalid, 33% horsepower nothing like Khalid
Besides, you haven’t even played Chieftain Mk.10, you wouldn’t know how it does to comment on it
2 Likes
M60A3 TTS are all 9.0 and as good or better than the Chieftain 900 lmao.
Seems like cope to me.
3 Likes
“as good or better” lmao I want what you’re smoking
Tell me, what makes them better? Their lower speed? Less hp/tonne? Less armour? Perhaps their lower penetration across all ranges and most angles? Or maybe their higher profile is your thing? Do you prefer the slower vertical traverse?
The leaps of logic to defend the superior victim mentality of some British mains is astounding
Aaaand I know all I need to know lmao.
Ironic coming from someone that barely ventures beyond Germany in terms of ground.
You calling me a nation main is cute.
1 Like