The Hawk T.1A would be around 9.3 I’d say,
2xIR AAMs and a 30mm gunpod.
As for the T.2, would basically be the Hawk 200 on the dev with a 30mm gunpod instead of 2x25mms :shrug:
The better one to add would be the SAAF Mk.120 as they developed and integrated a GPS glide bomb (Umbani) which gives it something more to differentiate itself from the earlier versions instead of just having newer AAMs
just looked into t1a it may be more of a 9.7 - 10.3 aircraft due to lack of counter measures and only 4 weapon pylons if cannon being used. and only capable of using 9l
kh59 aint “op”, what you on about
Dear Gaijin,
I have noticed a lack of Japanese aircraft and tanks. May I suggest the Ki-64?
Alternatively, if this proves too troublesome, can you add the Indonesian BMP 3F? This should be an easy addition with minimal coding:
Also, I want to see an official dev response on why they think adding a trialed vehicle to China is okay, but Thailand cannot get the VT4. I should also add I’ve never seen any Chinese players begging for an Oplot
Oh, and let’s not forget that I’m not seeing any substantive protests over the M1 Abrams eventually coming to China through Taiwan
how about a hawk 100 or ct-155
would be something in between the hawk 200 prototype and later model. considering it had 6 hardpoints for missiles and 2 under the fuselage ones but lack radar too. this could be a good squadron vehicle then. more 11.7 or 12.0 br that is if the late hawk 200 gets the aim-120s.,
So the Hawk Mk.100 is basically equivalent to the Hawk 200 prototypes, the Hawk Mk.120 is an improved Hawk Mk.100/Mk.115 and gets something extra to spice it up compared to the Earlier marks
looks that way. but the mk 115 should just be called the ct-155 since it was the export version for canada.
If SU-30MK2 AMV does not have a targeting pod it should’t be enable to fire the kh-29L’s
I think a bug report manager sayd it have like the su 25 a tg system onboard.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/OH9vr6vyTbke
Crewless turret yet you die to ammo detonation…
Gaijins infinite wisdom strikes again
Im sorry but the Chi-ri does not belong at 5.7 just because the auto loader holds more rounds. The nerfed reload rate on top of the already massive profile, slow mobility and lack of armor far outweighs the increased capacity. What is a Chi-ri going to do against king tigers, pershings, jagdtigers and all the other heavies at 6.7
I’m still waiting on this unique heli to be added to the uk ah64e would be alright, i feel like id still prefer this
Many players are against that new repair system.
It could be great if someone from gaijin talk about this.
Then, if you really implement it, do it in AB, not in RB.
On another note:
AH-64E is the new F-16 , because apparently China , France , and Japan are getting Guardians.
So far , China and France get direct copy paste , and the Japanese one lacks radar and LDIRCM.
In fact, looking at the unboxing info, this time there might be 3 AH-64Es. Besides the Chinese one you mentioned, there also might be a French one(from Dutch) Japan might have an Indonesian one? But I’m really curious—none of these three should have the AGM-179, right? (Definitely not.) They’re most likely still use Hellfire. As for DIRCCM, online sources are conflicting—some say it’s included, others say it’s not
Who thought giving France its 3rd FnF heli before Britain gets one is a good idea?
And its sub tree copy paste. L
According to the document, the Netherlands bought (or is planning to) 296 AGM-179 JAGMs, and they’re meant to be used on their AH-64E Apaches.
https://media.defense.gov/2025/Jun/12/2003737650/-1/-1/0/PRESS%20RELEASE%20-%20NETHERLANDS%2025-31%20CN.PDF
