The regenerative steering should stop when you let go of w. In the current iteration it just keeps going forward like youre still holding w. Makes no sense imo.
For real,right now it’s just a Tornado IDS ASSTA without LGBs and TGP but is somehow Tier 8 instead of Tier 7
probably
What better armour, theres only structural steel side boxes for storage
It literally doesnt make sense to be 6.7
Good thing right
120mm VS 100mm on front plate and its flat front plate now instead of having weird corners
also the faster reload is very nice
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT Good evening,
is it possible that we could see the implementation of these bugreports, if not could you push them?
thanks
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/baXDGOhJvXxj
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ve0RuNWUDAm4
ALE-50 that isn’t ready yet probably.
regenerative is also just bugged on the dev.
I can accelerate up to any speed, but lets use 40 km/h for example, let go of my W key and keep up that speed indefinitely by simply zigzagging with A and D.
1 Like
hmmm i see…but well thats why its for testing no? But also isnt that at least somewhat how regenerative steering works? more power to outter track and less on inner? so A/D infinitely will still keep it at speed? That was in parts even working before with the old steering. switching from a to d constantly would zigzag you forwards slowly as long as you have been moving when you started so you dont just turn the hull left/right in tanks with neutral steering? In russian t-Series tanks you could even move forward from standstill just by using a/d (ahhh that gave me a great idea for a BPA_JON nuke challenge, brb…)
1 Like
F-14D(R).
Ideally the premium F-14 should have been the F-14A testbed with AMRAAMs and Agiles, or the F-14B prototype with F401s, or the F-14 ADC, or the F-14A+, or the F-14D(R) as a lowest-effort option.
But if the premium is to remain the F-14D Gaijin should at least make the TT version thedistinct if not unique F-14D(R) model rather than slapping a skin and squadron name on it and calling it a day.
2 Likes
You’re just straight up lying rn
The suggestion doesnt even mention 120mm ANYWHERE
Both aim same place
It is very much just overtiered IS-2 1944
1,6 sec reload and worse accel does not mean it should be 0.3 BR higher than proper IS-2.
1 Like
Looking like I need to get on my soap box about Exocet again. Fun.
i might be wrong but, we got 20% of the update as premium ?
1 Like
The report is basically nothing, but might be because it has two flight control system nodes?
RBS-15 is also missing, so they are probably arriving at a later stage. hopefully
1 Like
I have my doubts, sadly.
Probably a mention to how both copilot and pilot have controls, yet when either lost control it was completly gone, now both must be lost instead of one
Whats that on the last picture?
Also, if it isnt, you should report it!