The Dev Server is Opening with Major Update “Sky Odyssey”! — 04.09.2026

Dev Server "Sky Odyssey" Dev Server Changelog
401

@Smin1080p_WT

Hi Smin, any chance we could finally see these reports implemented? Small changes, but still interesting, especially for Nuclear Thunder mode.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CFwuMakodosy
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/NVac6WyIpH6q
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/P4gBwdqsttSZ
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Vy5ZjhTKRgMj
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ay2RL7nDGtch
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ns9ybAQptak8

2 Likes
402

It doesn’t really show up on missile simulator because you lob them but they are quite a bit better than APKWS in performance

403

They removed the hit/critical/destroyed pop up from ground on the windows build or is this a Linux client issue?

404

82e28fe77eeaa321b969c1e82a3d1289
7G

ffab63c9736e9a0b18f7faa672ac929e
ffab63c9736e9a0b18f7faa672ac929e1920×1080 623 KB

Unable to access the Dev server

405

What performance would M1060CV give them? I wouldnt really say it hit those vehicles heavily, they were already lower BR than M1128 or CV90105. C
CT-CV90105 felt absolutely disgusting, idk about Boxer.

406

They monched the server :(

Wonder how long this’ll be. Hopefully certain things make an appearance.

407

hampter is taking a break, he will bet back on the wheel soon enough

408

my friend said it performance close to the M900, may be much stronger

409

I believe then it would be way too much for them to have without any BR changes.

410

Outperforms M900

411

image
if youre copy pasting atleast change the flag

5 Likes
412

The performance is more or less on par from what I’ve seen.

M1060CV pens 560 mm @ 60° 2000 m

M900 pens 566mm @ 60° 2000m

413

Brochure explicitly says its superior to M900, but I dont have irl penetration figures for M900 itself.

And even if I did, its not 100% comparable aslong as target material properties are unknown.

Stuff like Target Composition, Material-Density, Tensile-Strength, Yield-Strength and Hardness can affect the penetration drastically.

I dont have dimensions for M1060CV either, if I did, I could throw it into L/O to properly compare them.

414

the Jagu Ar 2 still there

415

GJ does a copy&paste from a regular TT aircraft US into a Israeli Premium …

416

Hellenic Air Force Tail Fin marking is missing in the roundels!

417

I dont think they need shell this powerful.
Is this the only info about it? Seems rather limited for them to even base pen off of it.

418

it does behave better than most bombers true, but it still catches fire and gets ripped to pieces as soon as someone gets on your tail.
sometimes i do get a little lucky and the protective gunners do enough damage to stop them from entirely killing me but it’s not always guaranteed

419

Theres some data in other brochures, definitely muzzle-velocity and penetration (560mm RHA at 60°, 2km)

420

YEah since it is not a “bomber” it’s a damn broken allready in ground games, as used on striker. I can imagine, how much more it can terrorize after getting bomber buff also