@Smin1080p_WT Is there anything that can be done about this problem? It’s really impacting A LOT of aircraft.
Smin, Do you know if its known that the New Sd.Kfz 234/2 “Biene” got updated in the last update and has now in a lot of languages the wrong name of s.Pz.Wg. “Biene”
These groupings lately are more like an advertisement “we reduce the grind, we listen you, feedback etc etc” than actual capability and progression based groupings.
Resulting in Kurnass grouped with F-15 or similar in Japan tree or F-18s being grouped with 1.7 BR differences in between.
unc smin wont understand anything your saying💔
your probably right let me edit this for uncsmin
fair enough now lmao
1 Like
Tbf these don’t list actual values, so devs can’t really use them
1 Like
i really hope the update comes next week and the devserver doesn’t get extended for another week
Probably drops this week tbf. Tuesday or Wednesday night server maintenance post maybe. Latest could be Thursday if it is indeed this week. Everything is more or less “ready” anyway
Ye, either 17th or 18th, my money is more on 17th ))
i am coping on maximum overdrive and pray that tomorrow the dev server ends and that same night we get the server maintenance post.
it’s not even a big update that interests me so much, i just want it to come out already
If it’s a trimode seekerhead like jagdm mr, I’d bet they would add 2 variants, a laser and and ir version.
Laser version would be nice as you can use gnss, IR version wouldn’t get gnss in game
I was meaning to make a bug report on the AN/ALR56C for 360⁰, as i found a document which looks and sounds official, but i want your opinion on it!
Unfortunately it’s the only one i could find…
I cannot attach the file itself as it’s a pdf, but I’ll give the link from it:
https://share.google/3SPsUepmVkmIzZj2o
so your making people research something they might not want to play or research as i don’t want to play that aircraft
@Smin1080p_WT hey, maybe I’m going blind but I would like an explanation on this
do we realize that he responded by pointing to the object to the left of the one I was trying to demonstrate is not present?
also, “The fact that this block isn’t on your scheme doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist on another”, can I please see these schemes, because I’m really curious to know where on earth they could have gotten them. I have shown more than one diagram made by both vehicle development companies (iveco and leonardo), what more do you need, the holy spirit?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/he6QK3Pmoyp8
5 Likes
The aircraft was already in front of the Tornado before the folder was created. Now the Tornado GR.1 cost even less to research than before. It was previously 390,000+ RP and is now 130,000 RP. So it is significantly easier to get to the Tornado GR.1 if you want it than before. You are also not required to play the F-111C to get the Tornado GR.1.
2 Likes
But my question why would i bother researching something if i have no intention of playing it? Sure i get someone who isn’t me plays it but for me personally it’s a aircraft that’s in the way of what i really want to play and is stopping me grinding the rest of that line. I feel like just saying get it and not play it doesn’t solve the problem of im not interested in it at all, the only way I would be interested in it is if it was that ranks premium vehicle which i feel it should have been
1 Like
I’m not sure I understand the question, given again with context, the F-111C was before the Tornado before the folder even occurred? Its not like the Tornado was moved after the F-111 before these changes.
The fact the Tornado GR.1 is now within a folder with the F-111, means the Tornado is even easier to research than it was before as a result of these changes.
As for not being interested in this aircraft, there is always going to be a vehicle within a particular given line that someone may not be interested in personally. But you are not required to play it if you really don’t wish to even try it.
As a result of the changes though, the Tornado GR.1 will be yours faster than before this change occurred anyway.
Respectfully someone else can come along and say the exact same thing in the opposite direction, or even the exact same remark about another folder group. For example someone might say they really wanted the Spitfire LF Mk IX, but they have to research the Mk XIV and Mk XVIII first to get it. This comes down to pure personal preference in that regard.
Someone else could then come along (if we changed the order around) and disagree that they are required to Research two Tornados in a row (GR.1 then GR.4), rather than two totally different aircraft with unique features and distinguishments.
Everyone has their own personal opinions on what they are interested in most. Unfortunately we could never keep flipping vehicles around in different orders to try and suit purely opinion only, as everyone has their own and there would always be someone who disagrees with the opinion of someone else.
Regarding why the F-111C is a tree vehicle, we explained at the time that this was due to requests for the RAF F-111K. Which was cancelled before the first examples were ever finished or even flew. The RAAF F-111C provided a perfect candidate to fill that gap, whilst being under the umbrella of the commonwealth too.
1 Like
so hard meet player’s can playing use their brain like that
1 Like