Will gaijin model the RCS for the munitions and Low Observailable mechanic to the JSOW, which was the main point of the JSOW to be stealthy ?
2 Likes
Back to the topic of AGM-154A, i believe a person has stated currently that missiles like the Aim-120C-5/C-7 from the american sam systems, according to their testing have failed to intercept the jsow variant(sadly i dont think they got time to test it against the BUK/SAMPT arh based systems) . Whilst normal salcos/IIR sam based systems have continued to intercept fine.
Is there still configuration going on or does it seem like the jsows have some advantage when it comes to facing ARH missiles. Could the developers be modeling some sort reduction? Or is this just a false effect felt by the player. Can you confirm?
probably because gripen e mains didn’t complain as much as J-10C mains did
maybe because J-10C and J-15T is in a bad state?
Is it not good to give buffs to a vehicle that needs it cause another vehicle that also needs buffs didnt get it, what logic is that
both
mmmh…i wonder why…
Squeaky wheel gets the grease!
1 Like
Well that can be said of any aircraft to be fair, especially weapon-wise.
If J-10C is in a bad state then so is the Gripen E since both of them are relatively the same in overall performance capabilities for air rb, maybe J-10C slightly better since it carries PL-12 and not AMRAAMs. So no, J-10C getting feedback and fixes from Gaijin while Gripen E doesn’t, is not because J-10C is in a bad state and Gripen E is not.
i can understand weapon wise (adding every NATO weapon on a single aircraft like yeah ok), but the aircraft itself doesnt have his 360° rwr, maw doesnt work, mfd are bugged as hell and hmd is a copy paste of the C model. also there is many more issues that there is even a list of every report made and ignored.
changed my post to better fit what i meant to say, of course i think gripen e needs air to air buffs
I feel like it’s because the jet was kinda rushed in the last dev updates of Line of Contact.
Still doesn’t justify the fact that reports aren’t acted on, that is true.
No one said J-10C shouldn’t get buffs, just that Gripen E simply did not because Gripen E mains did not complain as much as J-10C mains did, that’s all. I did not make any more statement beyond that scope.
ofc it was rushed it was released a week after the dev servers was open, the main problem is that even after 2 updates it doesnt get anything except a hud that make it unplayable in sim (where it was barely ok)
The so called “J-10C buffs” — an engine whose (marginal) increase in performance is mostly present at sea level and decreases the more alt it gains, all while increasing the already terrible fuel consumption, increasing the weight of the aircraft and effectively changing nothing when it comes to the J-10C flight model.
The second buff: PL-12A, a missile that’s not even finished and sorrounded by its own problems.
TL:DR — nothing changed. The plane is practically in the same state as when it released, and it still feels like garbage
6 Likes
doesnt change the fact that the gripen e got nothing except bugs, you asked for changes on j10c, you got them while you didnt needed them
What makes you think it didn’t need them?
Lmao
1 Like
asking the same for the gripen e, still why did it get nothing ?
lmao
like you got what you asked for and keep complaining for nothing