HI @Smin1080p_WT , are there any plans to make the spike launcher on the namer / eitan deployable like in real life?
Since in-game it makes for a really bad minimum firing distance for the spikes, which is the only anti mbt armament for them.
cheers
@Smin1080p_WT is it internally known that the Commander sight of the Schwerer Waffenträger does still not work?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ZvHXloXUTCmc
Just wait?
I just want it limited to 7.7 and below. That map has no right being in higher tiers.
so essentially 2 copy paste aircrafts and a unique modification for the T-50 locked behind a paywall?
What a lovely addition
I do wish they had done another 3 premium vehicle pack 🫤
you can only take a single pylon and still get the maw and some extra CMs
I doubt a MiG-29K or KR or upgraded M or MiG-35 come before the next F-16.
Which would require to Chinese to whine for an F-16V and not get served a Su-30MK2
@Smin1080p_WT just letting you guys know that there is a misplaced asset in B3 from the feedback remodel
I mean it gives them a terrible 12.3 aircraft lol. Guess it technically bridged the gap in their TT from 12.0 to 13.0
No like, just be in clan and play normally? You will eventually get enough squadron XP.
not everyone wants to wait a quarter of a year to get 1 plane
Even if you dont want to wait, saying its unobtainable is factually wrong.
Hey Smin, I was hoping for some further context on the addition of ‘shared’ vehicles in relation to end of 2025 dev QnA.
If a new variant of a pre-existing vehicle gets added and the pre-existing vehicle could be given to other trees but originally wasn’t. (For example, Russia is getting a Mig-29 9.12 (albeit I’m unsure what specific sub-variant) and the 9.12A is already In the game) would additions of the older in game variants to other tech trees be considered applicable to BVVDs statement. (For example, The 9-12A now going to USA/Britain via Poland)
You said previously that captured vehicles had to be used operationally in some capacity to be considered applicable to BVVDs statement on ‘shared vehicles’ so captured vehicles that were simply gleamed for technological insight and the like (such as the RAF ME-210) do not count. Therefor, Would an operationally used captured vehicle be applicable? Such as the British-Panther Cuckoo? Of which we have footage of it, in British markings, firing on German positions?
As always, I apologise if my wording is unclear or my information/knowledge isn’t accurate.
Also, I’m aware that the specific sub-variant that is Cuckoo is not present in game but, to my knowledge, the differences are relatively minor and would not require much work (by comparison) so, in my opinion, should apply to the rule
Wut? Why?
Still not worth it for this F-16C, 6 missiles is already a massive handicap at 14.3, no need to handicap yourself even further by sacrificing another missile.
Not to mention that the asymmetrical loadout would look pretty bad.
Gaijin has not explicitly set out who Poland ‘belongs to’. Poland has presence in USA/Germany/Britain and Germany already has a Mig-29 9.12A.
Im asking less so in regards to copy-paste complaining/adding but rather getting clear rules/conditions in regards to BVVDs statement
