Please excuse me for the direct question @Smin1080p_WT however I must ask, are there any intentions from the developers to fix the newly implemented Digital ADI (Attitude Director Indicator) for modern NATO aircraft?
I’ve of course filed a report regarding it, however it hasn’t been addressed yet so far.
Here are a few images for reference:
Thank you.
Here you can see it quite well:
It’s just the ramp and door that don’t have a liner as far as I can tell;
Roughly this part should be entirely covered by the liner:
Note: not all pictures show CRV’s (only those with the vehicle that has the “signature Rheinmetall demo” camo, however the liner layout is the same with the sole exception being the roof depending on the variant and the associated hatches/turrets fitted.
currently trying to push armor buffs too, since there is enough evidence for at least the 2 boxer CRV’s to have level 6 and maybe the other ones getting it too
On another matter, is there a special reason or technical limitation why the spike launchers on the KF41 / Schwerer Waffenträger and similar are not allowed to be adjusted elevation wise?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/eqqt3XTUl723
Community Bug Reporting System ( This one still needs to get accepted)
Last question would be if increasing the amount ammo and spikes is still considered for the boxer.
Its not a troop transport its a fire support vehicle. It getting the same amount of spikes is just weird,
specialy cause the Freccia can get 10 for whatever reason. Compared to the 4 of the boxer.
The mechanic doesn’t exist yet for ATGM launchers.
the Interior Model is also wrong.
This has been reported already but rejected due to apparently lack of information when there is a picutre from the rear compartment where you can clearly see that this is all ammo racks for reloading ammo and not infantry transport
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2tNK2HjfWZAg
Hopefully they let sniper also act as pseudo-IRST as they use them for that as well.
where did you get this information from?
considering how bad the challengers are compared to every other top tier tank having an average winrate is quite the achievement
Will try to find it again later if I have the time. They’ve been seen running them on Air-to-Air loads a bunch recently.
Just doing my every few hours check in atm to see how things are going in here.
@Smin1080p_WT
Do you know if it is the devs’ intention that the F/A-18F will only have the long-range C-5 and D AMRAAM variants, and not the A or B variant that is perceived to have better short range turning performance?
The US F/A-18E is retaining the AIM-120As it had previously, in accordance with the rework of the AIM-120 modifications. But like other planes in the British tree, the Australian F/A-18A is equipped with AIM-120B rather than A, that would mean Aus Super Hornets don’t necessarily inherit access to AIM-120A.
There is parity between the F/A-18E and F/A-18F in all other aspects of their available armament now that the US aircraft has also got the AN/ASG-34 IRST/fuel pod.
I just wondered if it’s something that simply got lost in the sauce between reworking the modifications for adding AMRAAMs on existing planes, and integrating the new AIM-120D on new aircraft. Or if the RAAF plane is simply supposed to be disadvantaged in that shorter range domain compared to the US one (beyond simply being heavier)
With the coming boxers its gonna be 7 different vehicles (if i didnt miscount)
That are using that kind / similar version of top mounted atgm launchers.
It would be truely a worthwhile mechanic to add, considering a lot of future variants use similar systems and resolves one of the main problems of those vehicles
Hey smin quick question about the MiG-29M 9.15 156 bein added to the game as a squadron vehicle if i recall correctly. Is there going to be a tech tree equivalent going to be added sometime this year? I know the 9.19 has some of the bells and whistles of the 9.15 but it lacks the good flight model the 9.15 is supposed to have over the earlier MiGs along with the extra pylons.
Is it safe to assume that something akin to the 9.15 “155” prototype, the MiG-29K 9.31, or something similiar will be added to the MiG line of the tech tree?
The rest of the space is taken up by bread.
you cannot even see it on the dev server yet regulary
smin wont awnser anything regarding the Mig-29M since we arent supposed to see it yet
I figured it was pretty much an open secret at this point since you can see it on the dev without that much trouble, but you do have a point yeah
wasnt there a ground swedish vehicle that was in the works anyone got an idea what that was?
seems to stil be in the works
or well it’s just that Oxy said it’s something for him in sweden in the works, never definitely said it was a tank
it probably was the F-16 then
