They quote janes on the janes source aka they guessed
5 Likes
Still advocating I see, without any evidence that shows they used another source your claim doesnt mean anything.
So far only Jane gives exact engine weight numbers which matches with ingame weight which practically means they used Jane as source.
1 Like
Love it when thrust to weight ratio doesnt match stated weight and thrust
1 Like
looks amazing, but i think they forgot to add the model for both pantsir turret rings
J15T still has the same radar as the J10C
You do understand that it isn’t necessary to present evidence that they used another source, in order to point out that the claim of Gaijin using Jane’s doesn’t have sufficient evidence itself?
I only looked 2 minutes and found another source already
1 Like
Neither jane or this source’s numbers match the 8.8 twr
It says 8.8 twr there with 1795 kg
2 Likes
Except in game its not reflected as it is only 7.5, unless there is some obscure formula that makes it reach the 8.8 figure with the thrust and weight given
3 Likes
In-game takes into account channel loss though?
1 Like
Some reports regarding performance have been accepted, not sure if they’ll be implemented though or what the status of the reports are
1 Like
30000 lbf / 3957 lb = 7.5
3 Likes
The WS-10 equipped J-10C in game produces 13.578 kgf installed, so unless you mean to tell me they showed the installed figure in that source, or the J-10C is overperforming in thrust, something is clearly wrong
1 Like
Might be talking about some emergency mode or something.
Tho it’s highly unlikely, source is prolly jsut garbage
Sadly the Su-33 cannot fit any other countermeasures like other flankers theoretically could…
1 Like
Yeah it uses APP-50 and not uv-50 like modern flankers.
So it’s stuck with older style cms which is terrible
2 Likes
They also magically increased the channel loss on the J-10C after giving it the ws-10B engine, and now has more channel loss than a flanker
1 Like
Yeah base flankers and naval flankers do be different. I dont think devs really need to do much here, just lower the Battle rating of the J-15T and call it a day.
2 Likes
I guess if they want to give China a true 14.7 for the time being they should look into adding the J-16 instead
4 Likes