Nor did he read it, because the User just pointed out that while the Dev server Updated the Spall-Liner vanishes which were allready there on a Prior version
too late.
The first report for the Sentinel I hope gets fixed eventually. Because fixing it means the devs need to rework how radars scan in game. Currently ground radars are simulated essentially as a stationary radar that can scan 360°, as result adding TWS ESA doesn’t really work for them unless you give them the ability to update targets that the radar can’t see during rotation. Fixing this also would fix certain air radars like the CAPTOR-E, which currently are able to update tracked targets when the radar would technically be mechanically steered away.
The second report I don’t think is correct, I’ve at least done some research about it myself and found that the ‘electronic back-scan’ refers to the ability to steer the beam in azimuth, and back-scan would be used to hold the beam on a target whilst the radar keeps rotating. You can read more here.
I kinda suspect this change was made because an internal report was made using this info, but not sure…
@Smin1080p_WT Do you guys planning to remodel the trees on air rb maps?
Its outrageous that trees on some maps has 40-50 meter height and effectively nullify multipathing.
I mean which developer though those tree heights are aceeptable in current environment?
Maybe there’s still hope (maybe).
they looked at mammoth trees and said “yeah every country has these and only these”
5 gaijillion on flat areas
mmm gaijin fisiks
btw this is a 5 months old image.

if tunguska can have unrealistic -9 i want my gepards -10 back >:( smh smh tunguska bias
Hey. There is an internal report to review the gun collision issue already up.
Good afternoon! Are there plans to add an anti-fragmentation lining to the Boxer sWaTrglnf gun turret?
Alright, thank you for the fast response!
That because you only have 2 ARH missiles stock
You don’t understand man, the devs clearly modelled the super trees from the dinosaur times.
50m is too low, make them 100m tall🙏🏻
You know what?
Make it 200 hundred and reduce the multipath to 10 meters.
Is the Gripen D going to be 13.3? Worse FM and no cannon compared to the C variant, factoring in that the Gripen is a Close Combat Jet in today’s meta. At 13.3 it will be a bit different than the Gripen C. Or please give it the Griphon camo as a researchable skin.
I’m pretty sure they got that planned
With Fox-3 missiles? Nope.
Only premium Su-30’s have that benefit.
