smfh dont quote the part that’s wrong that makes me look bad
they do not have the same repositioner.
mk1 has same repositioner as mk0, but a different antenna
mk2 has different antenna and different repositioner to mk0 and mk1
1 Like
Sry mate, just flying over the hundreds of messages in the EFT thread. Must have overlooked the correction regarding the repositioner. Took it out of the quote.
haha it’s fine
As someone that plays Air AB - could you at least make this one a Strike Aircraft, so that it gets the better in air reload time on dumb bombs and rockets that are sometimes better and easier to use in at least that mode if not others? I get the MiG-29N likely should stay a fighter, I don’t know enough about the SU-30MKM as to if it really makes sense to make it a Strike aircraft as well, but the 2 seater F-18 is great for it, and Japan could really use a strike aircraft at the higher tiers… and the tiers in between that need filling. And in other areas you’ve kind of abolished just having a national sub tree, and it’s already kinda broken up in Japan (in a really weird way) - but if you make the F/A-18D a strike here, move the A-7 and AV-8 over, move the Alpha Jets and F-84 over to the bomber line - much as that leaves some gaps in the fighter lines - which I’m pretty sure other things can fill those gaps and not like the current setup doesn’t leave massive ones, you actually have generally a full line for the bombers that transitions to strike aircraft. Which - is consistent with every other national line other than Germany (where the heavy fighter line becomes strikes and bombers become Swiss), China (has nothing in the bomber line above Rank 5) and Israel is a 50/50 as the line with 2 bombers does end in a Strike Eagle variant but jumps to fighters in between (and with the other strike aircraft that could be there not in it but the other fighter line). And if the 29 and 30 stay as fighters - can always move them to the line that previously had the R2Y2’s - so that all 5 lines actually have high rank vehicles, and just fill in the rest later as was going to happen anyway.
Also, not knowing it’s Arcade BR off hand (everything I see I think is using RB), but the two seater F/A-18’s (‘missionized’ B, D, F) if put in as strike aircraft actually give the Naval/Strike line not only some more options, but potentially fill some gaps the US has in it’s line up between 11.7 and 14.0 in Air Arcade, especially in adding Supersonic aircraft in a BR range where it takes forever and a day to even get to the targets on certain maps in sub-sonic vehicles like the AV-8 and A-10.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT any info to share about Sweden ? Everyone getting AESA radars and sweden still without nothing
AESA Viggen truly
Is the premium status final?
80U$D Pack Premium AESA Viggen
would
I’d be suprised if it isn’t, theres already the Tech Tree MB-326K
I mean there should be more, imo MB-326B is a bit too special variant for a premium, being basically the least armed 326 (apart from 4-pyloned prototype). E or G with 30 mm gunpods would fit better as premium or even another K variant RS-24 with Viper 540 and ADEN cannons, while MB-326B would fill 6.x CAS gap in the TT.
if we don’t see a model today, I really don’t think we’re getting the Gripen E. The update has to drop next week to avoid clashing with the Christmas schedule.**
On top of that, the Gripen E is a top-tier jet with new mechanics. It absolutely needs testing before hitting the live servers—they can’t just skip that**
Gaijin please skip the AIM-9L research already
5 Likes
they will fix it tonight
@grok is this true
2 Likes
13.7?
Its all ground RB
Ah copy. Looks like a C with brimstones lol
did they change the J-10C engine ??