Well, the devs seem to think it does…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/77EKtlIaQQgu
Report on JAS39E using the wrong HMD
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7M6wV42Xenfp
Report on JAS39E incorrect MFD
Easiest guess of my life
So who decides which source to use? Do they flip a coin?
as far as the convo went in the EFT thread its not really about whose information you choose, its about how its interpreted. Because the source stating 90° might be referring to the radars capabilities when set to max range, while the other source doesnt directly do that.
why booker is 10.7 ?? bcs m900? or tHe UlTrA resistent chasis?
Whichever is best for balance (in their opinion)
That would be understandable, if the german EFT had something else. How is making 3 identical planes and then just nerfing one of them? Like there WAS a balance amongst them, before they decided to change it.
the point is… what?
“we dont plan to add toptier premiums that would be exceptionally effective or strong”
proceeds to add an almost 14.0 jet performance (not a literally 14.0 performance)
also he’s prob becoming the best CAS for China
Read the F18 E devblog, they have a dev comment about their intention on adding rank 9 early next year. So by their rules the MKK will not a “top tier premium” anymore.
Top BR is 14.3 anyway
14.0 is a stretch considering its a much worse J11B, 13.7 performance more like it
Yes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DzRZfCtbRE3R
Report on Su-30SM2’s RWR use an incorrect antenna configuration
How do you know if they’re rwr antennas?
Changelog updated
Nice. Do we have any updates on XP-55’s unhistorical armament?
Bug report: XP-55 Armament Incorrect – accepted & forwarded
since we will lose the 20mms in the future for xp-55 i do hope they find a way to keep them? maybe as a offensive weapon option? with the lack of the 20mm cannons. the plane will def need a drop in its br.
