The Dev Server is Opening with Major Update “Heavy Cavalry”! — 05.06.2026

Dev Server "Heavy Cavalry" Dev Server Changelog
64

It is fastly skipped but Scheer also being a premium is ugly, considering its gap exists and clearly visible on the tree

65

i mean anything struggles to pen at 1200metres, maybe set it to a more realistic match range of 300-500metres

66

The level of inaccuracy from the band coverage on statcards for ARMs is just depressing.

67

The poor AMX-13-M24 too.

1 Like
68

m829a2 IRL is supposed to be able to go through K5 out to about 1500m (it cant even do it point blank in game) and m829a3 is supposed to be able to do it at basically any range, because it has a sacrificial steel tip that detonates the K5 block without it disturbing the actual penetrator

4 Likes
69

i see, so a massive bug then

70

Bug reporting time

71

feel like this shouldn’t be a squadron vehicle in the British tree, should be tech tree as a line filler between the Vickers mk7 and the new m1a2c

72

Why have the M-346FA in line 4 of Italy’s TT?

image
image1017×611 146 KB

It’s an Italian armed trainer and a successor to the AMX why is it in line 4 with Hungarian attackers and not in the same line as the AMX?

2 Likes
73

A3 was made to defeat K-5, not Relikt;
A4 was made to defeat Relikt- it’s as long as A3, except heavier and yet also 100m/s faster.

A3 will be balanced, giving the U.S an edge against all K-5 tanks; A4, and therefore defeating Relikt, would be way too much and render Russia completely useless if they could not rely on their armor even a bit.

3 Likes
74

They both shuld maybe later in the Dev
Will Sufa or D also get the inner pilons changed ?

75

No fix to the armor of the Israeli top tier tanks? nothing whatsoever?

So all our Merkava Mk. 4 tanks, Both the Namer’s and the Eitan, are still gonna have their nothing armor that doesn’t do anything? what about these??

Is this reoccurring Issue with the armor of the Israeli tanks, really gonna simply be ignored again???

76

hell yeah

77

Ah yes, because the armour is the only thing keeping russia as the most powerful nation right now.
It’s not like russia also gets the strongest cas, the strongest spaa, the strongest helicopters, the strongest light tanks, or the strongest anything else really. Nope; aside from the strong armour russia is actually the worst nation in the game, with literally no way to fight against the other nations.

(This is a forbidden tecnique called sarcasm)

7 Likes
79

…and being able to violate T-80BVMs and T-90Ms would help against all of that in… what way, exactly?

Also, BMPT’s accuracy has taken an ENORMOUS hit in the Dev Server, in case you did not know.

2 Likes
80

Not having to aim for a tiny area at 1km when they can just shoot me anywhere

81

They have worse gun depression, they have worse gun elevation, they have worse reverse speed (specially T-90M), they have worse platform stability, they have worse rate of fire (MUCH worse in T-90’s case), they have worse penetration, they (T-90s) have worse top speed, they (T-90s) have worse acceleration…

Good armor is literally the ONE perk of the T-90Ms and T-80BVM, and you want to take it away from them…?

2 Likes
82

Can you please have a look at the following issue:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YubdNMcVUu68

83

Yes

84

And for the record, I’m like 10 hours away from being able to boot the dev server. So no, I did not know.