ohhhhh noooooooooooo lol, they must be British lovers
F-5Cs are modified F-5As with more armour and less restrictions on pull (irl at least). The devs could easily have made a model for a F-5A that had the capabilities of CMs and AAM, but instead they opted to make something up
there is no late f-5c, the f-5c designation was only applied to 12 f-5a airframes modified for air-to-air refueling and trialed by the USAF for about half a year. every airframe used in the skoshi tiger program was later modified back into an f-5a
Which is why / is applied in my comment
@Smin1080p_WT do developers plan some major mobility revise like they are doing with modules and armor? Asking because some vehicles (namely Type 10 family) suffer from inability to properly report a features like CVT and as a consequence receive a deserved mobility buff. Especially now that new internal modules nerf already niche vehicles. And the regenerative steering ofcourse.
3 Likes
Yeah the type 10 I feel really need it’s mobility buff as that’s it’s only mode of survivability. And rn it feels unnecessarily sluggish despite its high power to weight, kinda like the lecleerc was back in the day.