Go on and say what you said perhaps you don’t know how to use the brimstones
Imagine that I only use the VTOL to slow down, because you’ll never see me hovering
Go on and say what you said perhaps you don’t know how to use the brimstones
Imagine that I only use the VTOL to slow down, because you’ll never see me hovering
You don’t forget that Soviet ARMs don’t have multiband seekers, right?
Don’t say that they’ll just use the two exceptions that are only on two planes
Vikhrs and Brimstones have equal range when fired from a subsonic platform. Brimstone 1s are basically just Hellfires.
Vikhrs is faster over said distances.
Vikhrs has Prox fuse making it much more reliable vs helis
Vikhrs doesnt have to deal with soviet ERA and therefore is much more reliable in killing a target.
The only advantage Brimstone 1s have currently is that they can be prefired on IOG, which just means you can delay lasing the target by about 2 seconds in something subsonic. But you cannot hit a target on IOG alone.
4 actually, but those are all top tier flankers
Me when mixed lobbies exist for several years
Well its still the same one band missile so meh Kh-29T still better option.
AGM-88 can reach to
So the player has to know which ARM to take when vs each nation and make an educated guess which to use. So yes, harder to use, but not impossible to use.
It still gets 2x good kinematic ARM at 11.0 with 0 BR increase from that addition.
Yea, or just pick 5 ALARMs on a supersonic platform, this is your logic?
that can lock onto everything, literally everything
Yeah? with a BR increase.
5x ALARM about equal 4x AGM-88 imo. (in terms of both speed and range. ALARM also has some tricky min ranges as well, so cant be used as a short range pop up attack weapon)
RET8 is 11.7 with 4x AGM-88.
RET8 also gets other notable buffs like MAWS, more flares, better engines, Better Tpod and better A2G weapons.
Tornado GR1 with 5x ALARM = Tornado RET8 with 4x AGM-88.
If that 5th ALARM is so unbeleivable OP though, then reduce count to 4.
But Tornado GR1 is being denied ANY ARM because it must be kept at 11.3. (For the record, we have no 11.0 or 11.3 ground vehicles, not one)
Su-39 and Su-17M4 are fine to get 2x good ARM at 11.0/11.3 without any influence on BR because… Genuinely no idea. In fact I dont think any aircraft other than the Tornado is getting a BR increase because they recieved ARM.
from sea level? Not a chance
Take a plane that’s capable of it and test it literally at Mach 1 with an F-18 flying at an altitude of 50 metres against an anti-aircraft system at 10k the missile reached 3,000 km/h.
Valid reason
Stop putting the kh58 on the same sack as the kh31, they are just strictly worse than the agm 88 as they have similar ballistics but much worse seeker.
The KH-31 also has a poor seeker, JUST kh-31pd have good seeker
Still. Was 11.0 before it got ARM and is 11.0 after.
no BR increase. If ARM are that good, then surely it would have had an influence on BR?