Oh, so that was an FB-10A! I totally thought it was one of those firecrackers I bought my cousin for Spring Festival. Honestly, let’s skip buying firecrackers for holidays altogether. We should just grab some of Gaijin’s specially brewed FB-10As from the game, stick 'em in the ground, and light 'em up for fun XD
Barely threatening guns and puny missiles, 12.0 is too bad for him.
Agreed. Actually, the combat effectiveness is only 11.3 or 11.7
I think Gaijin is at fault for deciding to add a system that has no to very little documentation,
A better option would be the FK-2000 which is relatively well documented in comparison
Everything is available
Radar specs
Missile specs
Chassis specs
Optics
Kill zones for different RSC and speeds
Yet they chose a option with no documentation and expect us to somehow get it for bug reports…
Like the FB-10A is laughably bad
It pulls no G’s. It’s slow, it has a tiny warhead, smaller then a TY-90’s… which is a 3× lighter missile
So even if you hit the target by some miracle it does no damage
5 Likes
This is the reason they choose this viecle, they can reject any informations or videos that shows how the 630(625) works just because these two viecles are not using the same cannon. Limitied informations also give them chances to make up every values for this viecle just because players can’t find any informations
2 Likes
Without its radar, CA’SA5 should be rated 11.0 or below.Considering all aspects, 11.3 might be more appropriate.I can’t really perceive a significant performance gap between it and other stuff like the 2S6.
At least the dual-mode seeker of FB10A needs to be restored; only then will it be worth 12.0.
Even the 2S6 can reliably shoot down drones in level flight, whether it’s small reconnaissance drones or attack drones like the MQ-1.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ZNv7Bj6b56UQ
Trying to get the HQ-17 corrected please support it
3 Likes
If cs/sa5 is not worth 12.0 where does swedish sls should stay 4 missiles no gun no mobility where should that go ? They should add dl and radio guidance to cs/sa5 so I can lock farther and make it 35g
Not only the 630, but Sweden’s SLS and Israel’s Spyder are even more useless than it. The SLS only has four missiles with inferior performance, and the Spyder’s missiles not only have worse performance but can even lose control and fly erratically. To be honest, these three non-segmented anti-aircraft vehicles in the new version all need to be scrapped and redesigned.
These three aa vehicles perform extremely poorly in the game. It basically has the performance at 10.7
There is an issue with FB-10A that irl has IIR - in game can’t even lock heli that 4km away. That hilarious how Gaijin nerfs China vehicles. If they fix problem with locking, then it’s good for 12.0
1 Like
Performance restoration should be prioritized over battle rating reduction. Top-tier anti-air vehicles are already scarce—further lowering BR is meaningless. Moreover, the current FB10A modification fails to achieve effective engagement beyond 10km, and the missile physically cannot reach its advertised 18km range. This constitutes misleading representation that discredits the system. We demand restoration of the missile’s actual thrust vectoring, warhead mass, and maneuverability specifications.
once again inexplicably the missile takes its freedom
I’m going to make a bug report because I have the impression that on the reporting service no one is doing it
1 Like
Recommend attaching a replay ID to prevent this issue from being dismissed.
1 Like
Thank you, I wouldn’t have thought of that. If you have any other comments, write them in the comments section of the report. Thank you
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pnEpmIrCJg71/edit
1 Like
It‘s over.Speechless administrators.
1 Like
gaijin releasing all full of content to make us forget the problems with the vehicles of minor nations “GAIJIN NO JUTSU”
1 Like
gaijin: “hold some poop,”
chinese players: “mmmmhh thanks”
1 Like