The american win rate is in the 30s and they decide to add the the rafale and euro fighter with CAS :D lovely

Game Discussion General Discussion
21

You do know the Typhoon has arguably weaker CAS power than the F-16C or F-15E (no FnF AGMs) and the Rafale has the same number of FnFs as both the F-16C and F-15E.

So… Su-34 and F-15E will likely still remain the bigger issue at top tier GRB. The only major change is for Germany which had basically no viable fixed wing CAS in the current compression

If anything, the heavy multirole power of the Typhoon and Rafale, a capability that France, Britain, Germany and Italy lacked, will help mitigate top tier CAS by adding more powerful CAP.

4 Likes
22

yeah, USA is just dragged down by Click-Bait players mainly

1 Like
23

Cry, cry me a river, cry me a whole damn ocean actually.

6 Likes
24

eh an ocean might not be enough

25

imagine if more people complained about stuff like BOL missing on F-15C, and lack of LJDAM on US aircraft, instead of this

1 Like
26

Even then , I dont think that would change much to do with what OP is complaining about.

What is needed is better top tier SPAA (for all nations). Cheaper CAP (for all nations) and a redesign of maps (which again, improves all nations)

Low win-rates is just a US player problem.

2 Likes
27

Why don’t we just go ahead and flood the planet as if it were a rice field.

9 Likes
28

yeah, but something like SEPv3 on top of everything else you said would make it more even against 122 and 2a7

though US really needs LJDAM since everyone else but the manufacturer, designer, and initial operator country has them

29

lol this cracked me up

30

Yeah if they’d fix the problems. Yes there are plenty of bad click bait players. Yes alot of them are new players but I also see alot of dumb t series drivers that just drive out into the open. People are dumb, it’s just more apparent because of how bad the Abrams is. Does no one have common sense? 9 different variants of Abrams with these bugs. It’s not like we’re asking for god mode, just fix what is wrong with the damned thing. It’ll make a better play experience for everyone.

31

What do you see as wrong

32

turret ring should be considerably thicker, fuel tank bulkheads are the 2 100% confirmed, irrefutable ones

33

image

1 Like
34

isnt the problem that it should be volumetric, specifically?

what is this?

35

should cover fuel tanks near driver all around and be 25mm thick iirc

36

so essentially fuel tank spall liners?

37

eh sorta? its RHA so idk if itll do much against spall but might catch a earlier or stock dart or 2 occasionaly

38

1359030408_rgnlfeniaiy
missing armor

This is not modeled at all

peep this thread if you’re interested

Armor around the turret ring is 50mm thick IRL it’s like 200mm lol

Lower mantlet under the turret isn’t volumetric armor so it’s 25.4mm basically anything that hits the UFP ricochets into there

3 Likes
39

25mm of rha is more than enough to catch shrapnel to my knowledge, in game the T-72/80/90’s thin ass RHA plate surrounding the autoloader was/is? a reason for a long time that these tanks wouldnt take damage with weird side shots

1 Like
40

The problem though, Yes, maybe SEPv3 would stand a better chance vs 122 and 2A7.

But how does a CR2, Merkava, Ariete, LeClerc, T-90, VT4A1 or Type 10 hold up against an SEPv3, 122 or 2A7?

Either the aforementioned tanks shouldnt see the meta tanks except in full uptiers, or they need to be fixed and brough on par to the others. At the moment Id argue most arent even really on par with teh Abrams at the moment, even though they should be fairly close.

And again, isnt there a turret ring bug report for the Abrams that needs to be fixed which might be all that is needed to bring US MBTs more in-line with the Leopards