yeah, USA is just dragged down by Click-Bait players mainly
1 Like
Cry, cry me a river, cry me a whole damn ocean actually.
6 Likes
eh an ocean might not be enough
imagine if more people complained about stuff like BOL missing on F-15C, and lack of LJDAM on US aircraft, instead of this
1 Like
Even then , I dont think that would change much to do with what OP is complaining about.
What is needed is better top tier SPAA (for all nations). Cheaper CAP (for all nations) and a redesign of maps (which again, improves all nations)
Low win-rates is just a US player problem.
2 Likes
Why don’t we just go ahead and flood the planet as if it were a rice field.
9 Likes
yeah, but something like SEPv3 on top of everything else you said would make it more even against 122 and 2a7
though US really needs LJDAM since everyone else but the manufacturer, designer, and initial operator country has them
lol this cracked me up
Yeah if they’d fix the problems. Yes there are plenty of bad click bait players. Yes alot of them are new players but I also see alot of dumb t series drivers that just drive out into the open. People are dumb, it’s just more apparent because of how bad the Abrams is. Does no one have common sense? 9 different variants of Abrams with these bugs. It’s not like we’re asking for god mode, just fix what is wrong with the damned thing. It’ll make a better play experience for everyone.
What do you see as wrong
turret ring should be considerably thicker, fuel tank bulkheads are the 2 100% confirmed, irrefutable ones
1 Like
isnt the problem that it should be volumetric, specifically?
what is this?
should cover fuel tanks near driver all around and be 25mm thick iirc
so essentially fuel tank spall liners?
eh sorta? its RHA so idk if itll do much against spall but might catch a earlier or stock dart or 2 occasionaly
This is not modeled at all
peep this thread if you’re interested
Armor around the turret ring is 50mm thick IRL it’s like 200mm lol
Lower mantlet under the turret isn’t volumetric armor so it’s 25.4mm basically anything that hits the UFP ricochets into there
3 Likes
25mm of rha is more than enough to catch shrapnel to my knowledge, in game the T-72/80/90’s thin ass RHA plate surrounding the autoloader was/is? a reason for a long time that these tanks wouldnt take damage with weird side shots
1 Like
The problem though, Yes, maybe SEPv3 would stand a better chance vs 122 and 2A7.
But how does a CR2, Merkava, Ariete, LeClerc, T-90, VT4A1 or Type 10 hold up against an SEPv3, 122 or 2A7?
Either the aforementioned tanks shouldnt see the meta tanks except in full uptiers, or they need to be fixed and brough on par to the others. At the moment Id argue most arent even really on par with teh Abrams at the moment, even though they should be fairly close.
And again, isnt there a turret ring bug report for the Abrams that needs to be fixed which might be all that is needed to bring US MBTs more in-line with the Leopards
a lot of times darts will just go straight through the hull armor. two layers of 25mm could fully make it spall and then catch said spall