Forum editor is being ass and not letting me properly edit that last post so I’ll say this separate, I think there are 10 nations so if the worst USA can get is 4th that is pretty damn good…
You do know the Typhoon has arguably weaker CAS power than the F-16C or F-15E (no FnF AGMs) and the Rafale has the same number of FnFs as both the F-16C and F-15E.
So… Su-34 and F-15E will likely still remain the bigger issue at top tier GRB. The only major change is for Germany which had basically no viable fixed wing CAS in the current compression
If anything, the heavy multirole power of the Typhoon and Rafale, a capability that France, Britain, Germany and Italy lacked, will help mitigate top tier CAS by adding more powerful CAP.
4 Likes
yeah, USA is just dragged down by Click-Bait players mainly
1 Like
Cry, cry me a river, cry me a whole damn ocean actually.
6 Likes
eh an ocean might not be enough
imagine if more people complained about stuff like BOL missing on F-15C, and lack of LJDAM on US aircraft, instead of this
1 Like
Even then , I dont think that would change much to do with what OP is complaining about.
What is needed is better top tier SPAA (for all nations). Cheaper CAP (for all nations) and a redesign of maps (which again, improves all nations)
Low win-rates is just a US player problem.
2 Likes
Why don’t we just go ahead and flood the planet as if it were a rice field.
9 Likes
yeah, but something like SEPv3 on top of everything else you said would make it more even against 122 and 2a7
though US really needs LJDAM since everyone else but the manufacturer, designer, and initial operator country has them
lol this cracked me up
Yeah if they’d fix the problems. Yes there are plenty of bad click bait players. Yes alot of them are new players but I also see alot of dumb t series drivers that just drive out into the open. People are dumb, it’s just more apparent because of how bad the Abrams is. Does no one have common sense? 9 different variants of Abrams with these bugs. It’s not like we’re asking for god mode, just fix what is wrong with the damned thing. It’ll make a better play experience for everyone.
What do you see as wrong
turret ring should be considerably thicker, fuel tank bulkheads are the 2 100% confirmed, irrefutable ones
1 Like
isnt the problem that it should be volumetric, specifically?
what is this?
should cover fuel tanks near driver all around and be 25mm thick iirc
so essentially fuel tank spall liners?
eh sorta? its RHA so idk if itll do much against spall but might catch a earlier or stock dart or 2 occasionaly
This is not modeled at all
peep this thread if you’re interested
Armor around the turret ring is 50mm thick IRL it’s like 200mm lol
Lower mantlet under the turret isn’t volumetric armor so it’s 25.4mm basically anything that hits the UFP ricochets into there
3 Likes
25mm of rha is more than enough to catch shrapnel to my knowledge, in game the T-72/80/90’s thin ass RHA plate surrounding the autoloader was/is? a reason for a long time that these tanks wouldnt take damage with weird side shots
1 Like