Claims of it being obtained are not proof of it being provided.
the thurst in-game are wrong
By how much?
the game is around 14.400kn, in the document of the friend says a 5000 lbf which is 22241,11N
In-game thrust is correct for high alt launch conditions
if you compare, the aim-54 still has the advantage before the 20 seconds of burn, the Phoenix still have one the best energy retentions in game
Might have just found a bunch more flight data for the AIM-54
The data is in Appendix E ( begins PDF pg# 59) and details basically everything about 9 shots.
Maximum altitude of AIM 54+ (latest variant): 30 000 meters. So it could shoot down the SR-71 Blackird or the U-2 spy plane :-)
Welp.That’s unfortunate.
Welp. There’s no excuse now. The SU-30 is in the game and there’s no mention of anything for the F-14/Aim-54 besides TWS+. Do you have any more data for a bug report? @MythicPi
I thought this was a new video. Why is YT recommending me this😭💔
When Dual-Plane maneuvering Gaijin?
when gaijin decides to not be cringe
lets pray for that shall we
They reduced the beamwidth (for AIM-54A/C & Fakour) to 6 degrees
Not sure why only for the transmitter though
Does that reduce the width of the beam that RWR’s will pick up?
It won’t affect the RWR
RWR will pick up the emissions if the aircraft is inside the beam (I.e. being tracked, either normally, or inertially while inside the notch)
It should affect the notch width and chaff sensitivity of the missile …
I don’t think you understood my question.