The C should go active from the rail, The A needs to get closer, sadly I don’t remember how close.
Even the c needs to get relatively close to go active irl , iircI in game both goes pitbull at 16km
im like beyond 99% certain that the big deal of the C variant is that it does not need to get close to go active. Atleast according to all sources I can remember. Atleast according to various sources I find when I do a quick google, I also have some vague memories of ex-F14 pilots talking on youtube about it.
No… the deal with the c is that they change to digital electronics and the mk 60 engine, for longer ranges you still need to use DL, this is a seeker limitation
active on the rail is when the missile is set to do so, and aim-54A can also do it
One upgrade the C does have is that it can go pitbull on it’s own without the radar commanding it to do so, the A can only go pitbull with loss of radar lock or the AWG commanding it.
EG if you toss a C at a target then fully loose lock until it reaches it’s intercept location it will go active and search for a target on it’s own over a wide area, meanwhile if you toss a A to the same location, unless you enable it to start searching when you break lock, it will just keep waiting for the radar to command it to go pitbull, and if that command never comes it wont actually go active.
Should be an option, especially in ACM since in the F-14 if you get a lock with any of the pilot commanded lock on modes with a 54, that missile is going active off the rail and pulling as hard as it can at the target you are sending it at. Such is by design, but not possible in game right now.
Part of this is almost certainly that pilots in DCS do not have the same kind of responsiveness and information-control that we do in WT.
In WT you have a red diamond that tells you exactly where the missile is, and you can essentially perfectly dodge any missile as long as you have sufficient energy by doing the the spiral (I mean, I know it is not possible at some speeds and for some planes, but the idea of doing the barrel-dodge is standard). In DCS they can’t do it as reliably because they are actually sitting in the plane and can’t see the missile approaching from ~50% of their vision. Do I think the AIM-54 is not as good as it should be? Well, maybe, but the reason why it doesn’t do as well in-game as it would in real life is because WT is a game and the players of the game can just hammer S and won’t get overwhelmed by the business of actually flying the aircraft.
Nah, even in sim the AIM-54 is a joke in WT. The mix of its slow speed, the terribly inconsistent AWG-9, the massive smoke trail, the fact it can be reliably seen on radar at any range, its poor maneuvrability, its disappointing seeker performance, and the all encompassing ever broken multipath that gaijin REALLY needs to remove or tone down just make it a gimmick missile. Fun, but not particularly effective in any way.
All the handholdy attributes of RB (missile diamond, 3rd person view, mouse aim) just make things even worse for an already terrible missile by making it even easier to see aquire and identify while also making it easier for players to abuse multipath.
Pudim over pudim its all about mingual, but mingual desnated or more cacal, just do mingual with corn dust, maise onion and peper with vacum, euler and log10, euler is vaccum log10 is for atm, but, cooking the onion soap sealed, but the energy release log 10 over log e
The rest is for unfortunety expert, new i will learn more
Imma be honest, I don’t understand.
You good bro?
Okay…
Spoiler
Now go to the breadship and tell help for some sail
Rlx i made on breadship eating bread in portugual eating mingal
a=54ms2 desv pad 6 to 2,3
Max speed 1600 ms
Jumper desv 216ms3
Loft var is 2,3
But how will this affect the trout population
Spoiler
Velocit and speed with burn, always remember the aim54C C means ceaseless, because the engine are cease on vaccum pod that balance in favor the missile win yourselve weight, because the thrust is to high with that compense the weight, they made that on center in line with the self weigth, the aim54 c sealed means more vaccum coef and eccm better polarization
Don’t forget about Lebron’s legacy