As for what the graphs portray those are very accurate, however, the flight tests contradict the graphs and a lot of it is all estimates based on what they have
i have spoken to a sweede, the go to museum and data is accurate, however me saying this is not proof unfortunately
worse g pull about 20 maybe 25 but basically an RB28 in anything exept a better seeker
what is the source?, nvm i missed the smc bit
Standard Missile Characteristics published by USAF, file linked under each missile type
I spoke to them to and they said they cant verify any of it


According to the Swedish Airforce the RB27 reached speeds to mach 3 in the instances shown here and “hit” the target in a matter of seconds
This also shows the firing limits of the RB 27, which is an Aim 26B, and it is not bad
Tp 84 is a C130 Hercules in Swedish service
Zoo Wee Mama
this would be peak for things like the F4C that have to use aim9Bs
We’re lucky that the AIM-4 on F-4C wouldn’t require you to do the ~15 to 20 step IRL switchology test every time.
Imagine if you had to do a CAPTCHA twice every time you wanted to use a Falcon from the Phantom, that’d be really accurate to how bad the Falcon was integrated into the Phantom.
better than aim9b 16gs
id rather 9b at that point
God bless the MA-1.
God bless saab shortening it in swedish service
AIM-4s were never on F-4Cs
yeah well D model F4 isnt in game so i see it as fine if they add it till they add the D model which may never happen
well its reason to add the falcons without ruining any current aircraft
Add the Delta dart with the Falcons
Yes, more planes with wizard cool missiles
Apparently the F-15 had them and fired them, very cool
Should be more falcon data soon hopefully