Damn I thought ~10months was enough time for you to pick a RF book and throughly read it and understand it, my bad. But I guess just copy pasting wiki paragraphs without a clue of what’s going on in a signal still does it right?
Here’s a tip, look up what the doppler bandwidth is in the f domain then why HPRF has an ambiguous range and an unambiguous velocity velocity and LPRF unambiguous range and ambiguous velocity. This( if you understand) is enough to show you that if you do doppler filtering, HPRF is better for high closure targets.
After this look up what frequency modulation is and how its used on pulsed signals. This( again, if you understand) will show you that range can be solved even when the range is greater than the max ambiguous range in a HPRF signal. Thus you can detect things at long ranges without compromising high closure targets.
I have no other choice if you don’t understand Peak power and AVG power( or even knew these 2 existed). It was the easiest way to break it down for you, and you don’t grasp the simple analogy.
Copypasting wiki again? I reiterate, read about FM and how range measurement is done with it in HPRF.
No you don’t because you keep parroting
Conversely, a high PRR/PRF can enhance target discrimination of nearer objects such as a periscope or fast moving missile leading to practices of employing low PRRs for search radar, and very high PRFs for fire control radars,
Did you read that? Can you comprehend it?
A radar system determines range through the time delay between pulse transmission and reception. For accurate range determination, especially over great distances a pulse must be transmitted and reflected before the next pulse is trnsmitted. Low PRF is for range detection.
then
If a target is on a beam aspect to the missile( or Vc is just near the missile velocity) then there’s no reason to have a huge doppler bandwidth.
For example if the seeker is on HPRF, the doppler bandwidth is 3000 m/s( ±1500 m/s) and it has 64 doppler cells, thats 47m/s each cell. And a max unambiguous range of 2km with 1 range cell. The seeker also has MPRF that has a bandwidth of 800m/s(±400 m/s )and same amount of doppler cells, thats 12.5 m/s per cell. Due to being MPRF it has an longer (as useful) maximum ambiguous range of 15km and 32 range gates, thus 468 m range cell.
Now if there’s a target(Vt=600m/s) head on to the missile(Vm=400m/s), Vc=1000 m/s, you can’t track it in MPRF as the max unambiguous velocity is 400m/s before it starts overlapping( in the frequency domain) and showing as a target thats going away. Thus you need to track it in HPRF which can track targets going ±1500 from the missiles TAS.
If the target is now near beaming the missile(Vm=400m/s), and the Vc drops to 476m/s. Lets say the MLC(“notch”) is at ±60m/s. If you continue in HPRF, with the doppler cell of 47m/s, the target will be in the second doppler cell but the MLC will be there aswell. Thus lock is lost. IF you switch to MPRF, the target will be in the 7th doppler cell and the MLC in the 4th doppler cell. Track is kept.. Chaff can be filtered better in MPRF if you think more.
On the second case, if we put the target has an altitude of 500m above the ground, the distance Target-missile is 700m, and the angle of the missile flightpath to the ground is 45°. The distance LoS ground-missile is 1407m. The target is within the HPRF range gate, but the ground clutter is on it aswell SO track is lost in the doppler and range spectrum. ON MPRF, the target is on the 2nd range cell and the ground clutter appears on the 4thrange cell. SO using HPRF we got a track in the range domain and in the doppler spectrum. Again, with chaff taking time to bloom, it can be out of the range cell. If the target effectively gets its signal in the MLC, Ex Vc=440m/s, but the geometry above is kept, track can still be done. Range and Doppler are BOTH analyzed in MPRF compared to HPRF where typically only doppler is analyzed. FM in HPRF will leave big range cells compared to MPRF.
This is why MPRF is important. IF YOU UNDERSTOOD THIS
Values are just examples. MPRF in one radar can be HPRF in another one and viceversa.
No, as stated previously. Besides simplification, the main radar has a greater gain that CW illumunators. Longer range is one imporvement, The rest were stated above.
Ironic. You don’t know the difference between a Continuous Wave and Continued Illumunation.
CW radar. You cannot see … and are dumbfounded how high PRF
This is my favorite. A CW signal has PRFs. TOP KEK
See above, the dude has always confused waveform with illumination. I still remember the AWG9 thread lmao. He also confuses carrier frequency and the PRF.