I just saw this video on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhz8OBisyts&t=2s
With SBU54 he can launch all the bomb to a dedicated target without any activation of the laser.
I decided to try but when I did the same test:
-Laser activate automatically
-All bombs went for the same and last target illuminated by the laser (logic)
For sure I miss something
For the laser you can desactivate it in parametre
Thank you, I just found the option do desactivate the auto laser mode.
Bug report related to AASM guidance issue :
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/wLgGgaNI6UtX
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TGTEIpAd3cKl
AASM Hammer does not have enough range
Al - Tariq for f3 when?
It’s basically a AASM with fold out wings, and the long range infrared tracking seeker of the Pgm series.
You can report it if you’d like, it should work since it was a French F.3R that equipped it and was displayed with it. This variant is what we have available in-game. Hopefully we can maybe get this as a lower SP cost option.
Yes
Hello, I would like to ask what is this thing on the side of AASM-250?
My cursor points to it in the picture.
Hello, those are likely anchor point for the REK(Range Extension Kit).
french Grom-1?
The REK is the booster that we already have in game. The white thing seems to be the structural anchor between the bomb body and the anchor and the booster itself, although I am not sur
You got any photos of Indian Hammer?
So no then.
Lets get a few things out of the way, AASM can clearly target a tank sized target, there is enough secondary information that calls out vehicle sized targets.
What does this targeting looks like?
Well. Lets play out an engagement;
Rafale with Hammer.
There are only two chances for a course correction, along with the distance needed for those course corrections. Each time its a static image, with no target vector or speed measurement, so each update will be to a new static location. A target moving with enough speed would outpace the ability for Hammer to provide updated locations with any hope of accuracy.
If it was a static tank that had moved to a new parking spot or a TEL thats been relocated to a new location this tracking method would ensure impact. But if those targets are actively moving, there is no chance.
depends the speed of the target and the armor it has
It would be very situational at the end of the day.
Heavy armored MBT moving at max speed, sure. Light tank stuck in a brawl fight and not moving much, meh.
Second capture, if taken 600m away from target, is just 2-3 seconds before impact. it doesn’t give time to dodge, unless you are already moving by the time the second picture is taken of course.
At the end of the day if it was fixed, it would become a more specialized weapon, best suited for SPAA hunt or cap denial, except you wouldn’t even need to expose yourself, just fire with GPS coordinates at the enemy spawn / cap.
Either the devs go the full IR LOAL way and we will see Brimstones, or KH38 IR and AASM IR will be removed, or they’ll ignore the issue entirely. I suppose time will tell
You know you can LOAL with Hammer right now? Nearly all IR/EO A2G weapons have;
"boundaryTrack": true
To employ boundary tracking you need only fire at a “POINT” target, the weapon will fly to the point and if there is a target that can be tracked it will switch to “TRACK” and guide to terminal.
Example with AGM-65G which also has
"boundaryTrack": true
yes and no. You still need to lock on the ground. You can’t lock via the minimap like GPS or GPS+Laser AASM for example
Yes the code is attached to the seeker, but if you try this with Penguin ASM, this can be employed well beyond the 2.5km tracking range of the seeker.
So a point target can be set beyond track range.
