I don’t think Gaijin implements design flaws on the vehicles, otherwise this game would be a pain to play.
2 Likes
“just because the barrels move by a few degrees doesnt mean the dispersion is off by a few degrees.”
Do you think bullets just correct their flightpath if the barrel was offset?
10 Likes
You don’t have real data on the accuracy. You’re relying on guesswork that won’t even pass a bug report. You’re literally inferring
2 Likes
Sure they do.
Accuracy is a thing in game, it’s adjusted all the time.
The turbo Parkinsons is a defining feature of the vehicle . This thing should absolutely not be nailing tanks from multiple kilometres away.
3 Likes
All automatic weapons have barrel flex during high rates of fire…
2 Likes
Things like the T58 and maus shouldn’t even exist then
they dont know the difference of 200 rpm and 800 rpm
1 Like
You can literally see the distance between the barrels is diffrent at the end of the vid then at the start lol
1 Like
What does that have to do with the accuracy of the guns when mounted on the bmpt?
2 Likes
yes thats why the puma for example is limited to 200rpm artificially
So is transmission/engine damage, but I don’t see tanks randomly breaking down due to their design flaws.
1 Like
Unless you have real data on the accuracy stop trying to guess
Gaijin models gun dispersion based on max delta angles. They’re taken from irl dispersion figures.
This (refering to irl BMPT)poor design causes the maximum and average dispersion to be horrendeous.
Saying that they shouldnt make it inacurrate because the inacurracy is caused by poor design is essentially like saying they should make every gun have 0.01° max dispersion because they could have designed it better.
Or that they shouldnt use real engine-hp values because a bad value is just a design flaw and they could have just used a better engine.
5 Likes
not as much as the promo video
This isnt just barrel flexing, this is absolutely terrible recoil compensation. (if there even is any)
3 Likes
They’re already using perfectly reliable engines/transmissions/breeches on many things that shouldn’t have that privilege.
If you want one, you’ll have to accept the other as well.
1 Like
Yea things like the maus can’t even function in the game by then
2 Likes
You are talking about mechanical breakdowns.
This is not that. This is significant design flaws in the weapons, not random breakdowns.
Weapons in game have accuracy values, this is no different.
7 Likes
Will the gun baffle inaccuracy be accurately depicted in game?
1 Like
You’re still relying on guesswork for this “significant design flaw”. Unless you can find Russian tests on this vehicle showing the accuracy of it’s guns then your claim is just wrong
There is 0 concrete data showing how this vehicle could be any better or worse than any other IFVs. And do you think Russians are stupid? Do any sane people let a vehicle with as much inaccuracy as you claim into production
1 Like