Well it’s not ‘pretty believable’ if he had to walk you through, frame-by-frame showing that the BMPT has an abysmal gun layout, disproving the lies of the last day
No it’s because someone finally has enough evidence lol. You look like you’ve been coping
How? I’ve been asking for gaijin to improve the tech tree one while modelling the realistic gun issues.
If campaigning for realism is ‘coping’ then what does that say about you
If you want that better make them implement it to western vehicles too
Point to a modern production western vehicle with similar gun issues to the BMPT?
Apache has gun wobble too
Can you find sources that an apache over the last 20 years has had detrimental gun wobble
(Bearing in mind it is designed with infantry suppression in mind so it has intentional dispersion in order to spread rounds over a wider area)
Reported, tested and fixed within 3 years, so good for them
Can’t say the same with Kamov or 2A42
Shows that there are still a number of issues. And do you not think Russia tests their equipment lol
Not saying they don’t test it, but the culture of lies within the Russian MIC means they aren’t improved until long after the issue arose, this has been a consistent trend from soviet times
Yea well what I’m trying to say is that gun wobble exists on a lot of vehicles and BMPT certainly isn’t the only one that has an issue
But there is a difference between an operational flaw thats addressed quickly, and a fundamental design flaw…
BMPT is the latter, you cannot ‘fix’ the gun wobble because it’s built into the gun design leading to poor accuracy, pretending that it’s remotely as accurate as the Bushmaster or Rheinmetall 30mm is blatantly false
It’s meant to be an anti infantry weapon… bigger dispersion isn’t that bad.
However the AT gun is equally as bad, which obviously isn’t intentional
I just hope the key binds won’t be crappy :(
The atgm, how?
At gun refers to the left 30mm, equipped with APDS
The ATGM launchers are whatever
All in all, it’ll be a worse Namer.

