it is should be at 12.7, literally t90m stock with head of bmp lol
Yes. It is not so good to be put on such higher br.
Well then, let’s put the M1A2 SEP V2 on 10.3. Because the Abrams has a turret ring that can be one-shot! Logic.
1 Like
You would probably still struggle in the SEPv2 even if it was 10.3 lmao.
5 Likes
In our game, BR is built not on the difficulty of hitting the target, but on its weak points.
Even that won’t help ya
3 Likes
absolutely agree
Of course it won’t help. The tank has a weak spot, which means it’s not a playable unit.
No. If it was true i would see something like M56 at much lower br.
1 Like
al the more so. look how many ideas you’ve come up with for balance
No i didn’t it was straw man made by you
4 Likes
Noticing a pattern with Russian vehicles always being added under-br’d
2 Likes
yes it is
Ah yes, only russian vehicles lmao.
6 Likes
Was meant to support tanks in urban areas more than infantry itself. Its more of an SPG than a LT no matter how you look at it.
1 Like
Not sure about 11.7 (only 4 missiles), but can definitely be at least 11.0 with APFSDS belt.
iirc it is classified as tank destroyer, meaning it has ammo box
2 Likes
And now the Terminator has anti-aircraft shells too. That’s simply amazing. We’re waiting for it to get APFSDS and be downgraded to 9.7.
So where were you guys when Jaguar got added at 11.0 with F&F missiles, APFSDS , and HEVT ?
What anti-aircraft shells? You mean regular HE?