Tank realism

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
1

The E-100 Couldn’t Support a Maus Turret, Only the Hull was Build, Like Feeting entirely diffirent Turret to a tank Changes it Capabilities entirely, Like Why didn’t the Object 292 recieve the Hull ERA from it’s BV hull? And Let’s Make a more Realistic example With the 292, It Techincly could Recieve the T-80BVM
Turret Upgrade, Same Outside Turret so it can take the ERA 100% ,they could feet in the Electonics, My point is What’s the realism logic?

Also a Perfect example by the 292 During it’s testing it Shooted a T-72 and it’s instruments Jumped out of there mounts and Cracks were made Turret.
Why there isn’t a Mechanic for that?

What’s the tank implementation Logic?

2

The answer is illogical, it all depends on Gaijin’s ideas )

3

Sure, let’s go full realism route.

I can’t wait to feast on the ocean of tears that the Ivan and West Taiwan players will cry as they find out that their nation’s hardware of choice is absolute dogwater compared to precision NATO engineering and especially Precision Freedom Engineering aka USA.

But, oh wait that will never happen because nobody will want to play the dogwater warsaw pact nations. So, guess we’re stuck.

3 Likes