the 90A get a armor buff? the dm53 no penetrate it in front… interesting fact…
“Tell me how my DM53 round didn’t pierced the second most armored part of a vehicle with kinetic ERA protection and modern composite materials?”
9 Likes
minor grammar mistake
The glacis composite armour and Kontakt-5 of a T-90A dates all the way back to 1987 though.
1 Like
Depends on which ‘T90’ you are referring to, indeed the earliest ones shared the same armour, but later ones got upgraded to be very similar to what is later seen on T90S.
its the A varinat waht is in 11.0 a toptier round no penetrate it in front? p ltell me…
The more common version in this forum is: ma Oobroms
There are multiple models of ‘t90A’ that one could refer to, whether it is the ‘original’ T90 upgraded to 90A standard, which features the same armour as late T72B variants, or T90As with brand new turret design for which I believe also had redesigned composite, wait a moment let me find some sources.
It absolutely would irl, the “T” series are the worst tanks in the world, only Russian pipe dream armor 😂
Obviously would mate, because the ammo penetration power values in game are totally diferent from the real counterparts. The same would happen to any other western vehicle.
This are same dudes that complain for Turms in a leopard 123 that got rightfully raised to 10.7, problem is that Turms is still shit at 10.3, I didn’t buy it thankfully but I think it’s pretty evident, when you have -4km/h reverse and dog water armour you’re basically done, the T-64b is more useful than Turms at 10.3
Indeed, it just got moved because the wave of people complaining of “Russian Bias” in the forums, it’s kinda odd the fact T-64B still at 9.7 with better composite materials than the T-72AV (Turms-T).