T80b sharing same autoloader as T80U/BVM's

7.5 is skipping 2 rounds in the autoloader, far from optimistic specially after taking into account that we mostly mostly load apfsds.

you cant load apfsds in sequence on soviet carousels as far as i know.

I can only see that being an issue with the 3bm60 anything else shouldnt have any issues at loading side by side as they are shorter, also i havent seen any hard evidence about that claim either or if that applies to both the t80 and t72 or just the t80.

im not so sure, i havent seen any examplyes of sequential loading of apfsds in training or combat footage ever. but you might be right for all i know. although 7.5 seconds is still below what most sources say in terms of reload speed for these autoloaders.

Because they dont load it together by doctrine, which doesnt implies a physical limitation.

T-80ReloadRate (1)

Д-81 (also known as 2A26) is a cannon used in T-64, so im guessing its not really accurate?

They use the same MZ autoloader desing and it is from the literally the t80 manual…, the 2a46M-1 is still a Д-81, just the TM, they clearely are not specifing as the 2a26 is tecnically the D-81T.
image
and we are not even talking about maximun rate of fire, but combat rate of fire.
image

2 Likes

little bro still using propaganda documents as his proofs

false flagged

Seems like the level of your arguments keeps going dowm…

2 Likes

Man, you literally use propaganda documents as truthful source. I am unable to reach down to your level.

You read propaganda documents to claim it’s doing 7 seconds. I used in in real life and tell you that it’s 10 seconds.

We are not on the same playing fields little bro.

Buddy, learn what a source is, your personal bs is meaningless, but, hey keep going with your elementary level argumentation…

2 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

You keep being a random guy on the Internet that use his unverifiable personal bs, and on the other hand we have an official technical manual from the 80s, whichs is by all means a valid source by war thunder standards as it is literally a primary source, again, keep trying buddy.

2 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Calling him little bro seriously makes you sound about 14 and from the US mate.

Wether or not its propaganda, personally cant read it so wont say.

It.is still a form of documented fire rate.

I know folks who served with t72 and said it was about 9 seconds so im inclined to agree though with 10 seconds.

Howveer most nato tanks in game have their firw range fire rate or near to it, not combat so in the game the soviet tanks are balance by it.

1 Like

THE BIGGEST INSULT I’VE EVER RECIEVED ON THIS FORUM

Called ancedotal evidence and anyone whos studied a field knows its not reliable without several backup sources.

Hi All! Please avoid using inflammatory language or making personal attacks when responding to others. It’s important to keep discussions respectful and focused on the topic.

1 Like

Well, you use the lingo of a teenager from the US then what does one think.

However like i said you only sound as such

You say this, and yet he calls me “american”