I am stealing that ty
it was a sarcastic question (the absurdity of the idea), but it seems you like it, hence your inability to think objectively or understand sarcasm.
It’s not all time stats, it’s one year stats and of course it reflects the performance of the tank, but because of your hatred on russian tanks, it seems YOU don’t understand stats at all or how a game is balanced. If you would spend more time in the game than on the forums, you would know better.
As a final effort in trying to educate you, most russian tanks at that BR (10.3) saw a sudden rise in statistic, specially the win rate, was with the addition of BMPT.
Hopefully you can make the connection yourself.
Than you for your attention in this matter.
It is as bad as t-80ud. What is your reasoning when you say it’s better?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
You don’t often see someone post a take so bad that NATO players, Russian players and multi nation players all agree about how bad said take is.
5 Likes
I don’t actually have the UD, and both T-72B has 8x gunner sight, it absolutely sucks at 10.3 because the only viable play style is cqc. I just love to be able to sit back and pick off targets one by one, TURMS-T and Moderna can do that just fine so does the UD which has similar FCS.
The gunner sight magnification is very important to me, I don’t know why people downplaying the importance, the sight can makes or breaks a tank for me.
you are insane lol
1 Like
I think now its good time to question your creditinals to make such dogmatic statements. After all, if you claim to understand the balance of the game so well, you should be able to translate that knowledge into game performance. That does not seem to be the case.
How can you understand and accurately describe ANY balance issue if you simply dont understand how the game is played in the first place?
T-80UD is staying at 10.7, what are you gonna do about it?
Me being active on forum is somehow relevant?
Forum counts simple scrolling as “posts read” so even if that metric was relevant to any argument made here, it isnt accurate.
However what I think is relevant metric to the argument being made is this:
Out of all arguments you made on this forum, your “best” one only ever managed to convince two people.
That kinda sucks considering how many people you need to convince to changethe T-80UD BR.
Also now that I clicked on your “most liked” comment, I know who you are
You are that guy that got ratioed to death lol.
2 Likes
Give it gen 1 gunner thermals already and put it at 11.0. Can’t you see how much this guy is suffering snail? He cyant seeeeeeeeeeee
I don’t know how such a bad ragebait attempt received so much attention.
1 Like
How hard can it be to understand that stats from year ago don’t matter at all. What matters is recent stats of the vehicles. It seems like you think that if we buff T-80UD now somehow those stats from year ago get better.
Tank needed nerf and now we can watch how the stats change after that nerf.
I mean just looking at his 2 most played vehicles tells me enough.
I find more interesting to look at which vehicles he played beside russian ones.
Oh right, nothing with more than 50 battles (that alone should be massive red flag) and the 4 most played vehicles that arent russian are…
3 chinese premiums and XM-1 (GM).
1 Like
Average forum complainer about some tanks being too weak while he only ever played 1 nation at all.
Bad rage bait or severe skill issue. I wonder why a premium tank that many noobs buy can have a low win rate.
1 Like
So 2 milion games were somehow “lucky” or what?
With some of the takes I see online I feel like the line between ragebait and someone being serious are blurring.
1 Like
Dude, it’s the internet. How on gods green earth are we supposed to understand Sarcasm without incantation and tone.
Sure, but objectively, from a raw (not player) statistical standpoint, the T-80UD is an equal to the OG Brooms. It has better armor and a much better round, and is smaller, while having a slightly longer reload (which is nullified of the Abrams only has two crew), worse gun handling, and worse speed.
It makes sense why it went up. It should never have faced 9.3s, just as the Brooms and Leo 2A4 shouldn’t. It may suck, but it’s the truth. It needed to be moved up to help with decompression.