These are extremly good news, I completly missed them.
2 Likes
so was the P51 mustang should the P51 H go to your tree aswell ?
the best thing to do would be remove T14 and refund everyone
hopefully they dont give it to the mark 7 churchill it using solidshot is the only thing keeping it balanced other wise its gonna get raised in br very quickly
If the US gets the Excelsior then sure
1 Like
Oh, well would you look at that.
1 Like
No. There was only 1 joint program, the T14, being a US/UK project. The A33 Excelsior was a purely British project.
The Brits wanted an assault tank, they had a go at doing it themselves, culminating in the A33, and at the same time they had a go with a collaborative project with the Americans, creating the T14.
You seem to have some wires crossed thinking that because the T14 was a joint project that the A33 was too? This is incorrect.
1 Like
+1, add it to the British tree as a TT or always-available premium vehicle and keep the US prem one available.
KV-1E doesn’t quite have the same glaring frontal weakspots as the T14 (turret face, massive MG port), and the T14 also doesn’t get access to the bonkers angled pen russian APHE.
It really isn’t “op” unless you’re in a KV-8 lul, unless you’re talking about how much better on average UK players are
This and the M22 should be in the British tree
It’s primarily because the US continued developing it when the British dropped out. majority of the production and such for prototypes was from the US.
4 Likes
dude the Excelsior which is more OP already is in the british tree. -1
1 Like
I’d be ok if it went to 5.0. Then we have a need for the T14 to come to the tree at 4.7
1 Like
And the Boarhound.
It’s an incredibly rare event vehicle that costs almost 90 Gaijin coins on the marketplace.
Why? The T14 was made for the British, the Excelsior was made for the British. That’s just cope.
1 Like
185mm frontal armor thats the same as the manlet as a tiger 2 H thats a 6.7 tank
american 75MM cannon on the sherman stands zero chance of penetrating any where frontally when it angles its almost completely immune to the long barreled 75MM of the german tanks too
1 Like
you can drivers port the KV1E and you can shoot the cheeks of the KV1E basically the same weakspot unlike KV1E you get a better gun the KV1E uses the F32 cannon which with its best round has 87MM of pen compared to the T14 with its pen of 104mm, the 3.7 KV1 L11 has 10mm less pen than the F32 it has 77mm, you also get a better reload 6.3 for the KV1E vs 5.0 second for the T14
yes you get the angle performance boost but on a gun with such low pen it almost doesnt really affect much
the T14 is as OP as the KV1E
Oh you’re so right bro, let’s measure the capability of the tank by the LOS thickness of a tiny little bit of armor. Same BR:
…You mean the same exact 75mm the T14 is armed with? And what? Immune to the german 75? 3.3 Pz IV F2, btw
And I say yet again, the KV-1E’s round has far better angled performance to the point where you can get away with some truly absurd pens comparatively. The T14’s weakspots are massive and obvious by comparison, and it faces much better guns on average.
just like with the m6a1 that should be in the british TT.
British M6? Tell me more.