An export M1A2… that didn’t even exist yet because it was originally created for the Swedish Trials that happened ~3 years later? Why would UK be helping US develop DU armour (as they state so themselves), if it isn’t actually DU?
You’re resorting to mental gymanstics now. This is all said in the snipets YOU posted, do you even read your own sources?
At the very least, it needs to be shown that what they tested was actually a DU Abrams.
Your own source…
Spoiler
Sounds like the US told the UK they wanted to make US DU better protected in CE, but the UK didn’t help them out. This has nothing to do with the KE protection of the US DU, which was said to be the best available when the M1A1HA was introduced.
???
The hell are you intepreting? US wanted FRG to help them develop a more mass-efficient armour for their HAP-2, in exchange they’d release the KE components to Germany - > UK didn’t want that, new MOU is signed
|
v
This suggests the US never discussed the M1A2’s (second-generation) DU with the UK, at the very least before 1990.
CLEARLY they did, seeing as UK had began a development of an improved variant for US after both witnessed D-technology’s efficiency (and said armour was at a very early stage of development itself).
This against suggests that the US didn’t share their DU technology, otherwise it one, would’ve been mentioned, and two, the US didn’t seem keen on sharing their DU tech in the first place (so the “US desire to introduce a new MOU based on reciprocity, allowing the bilateral exchange of technology,” would most likely not include DU, even if they say “all armour”).
“The US desire to introduce a new MOU based on reciprocity, allowing the bilateral exchange of technology on all AFV armors in addition to the 1979 MOU, came to fruition in March 1990.”
Lets get this bread guys;
- UK & US sign a new MOU in which they agree to share alll armour developments (very easy to understand)
“nooo, they only meant all non-DU armours!!11”
US only introduced HAP-1 i.e 1st generation DU armour into service in 1989 with the M1A1 HA, not too long after they test an improved variant (HAP-2) with UK’s help, then, loo’n’behold a year later they sign a MOU agreeing to share this development (they themselves stated all developments will shared, arguing against that is just making yourself out to be an idiot).
Again, there needs to be proof they are testing a DU-equipped Abrams.
You didn’t read the contents of that report at all, have you? Because it’s talking about the non-DU, bog standard, vanilla looking ahh M1A1 found at 11.0. There is not a single mention of it being DU equipped, and what I did was prove that the normal M1A1 most definitely did not have anywhere near ~1000mm KE RHAe.
So far you’ve proven to be;
- disingenous in your interpretations
- unable to read your own sources (while acting like they support your cause)
Wanna add something else to the pile?