T-62D - Tam Dushman !

Would you like to see this in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
How would you like to see this in-game?
  • Tech tree
  • Premium
  • Event (Squadron, Battle Pass, etc.)
  • I do not want it
0 voters

Hello !

I’d like to suggest the addition of a tank that would act as a transitional model between the classic T-62 and the improved T-62M. That tank would be the T-62D, also known as 166D, a tank that you’ve likely already seen but never noticed that it wasn’t a standard T-62M.


The T-62D as built in its initial 1980 state.

History

Spoiler

The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan began in 1979. While the Soviets did not bring their full might, the 40th Army still brought plenty of tanks. While the tanks showed their potential, especially as heavily fortified gun positions, the Soviets still knew that they had no meaningful protection against rocket launchers and AT mines. In fact, in 1980 only, 18 tanks were written off. In 1981, it would be 28 tanks.

These losses were considered serious enough that the Main command of the Soviet Ground Forces asked for the quick development and deployment of improved vehicles based on troop feedback.
Those vehicles would sport the letter “D” at the end of their name, colloquially meaning “Dushman” (officially, “доработанный”, “refined”), a word commonly used by the Soviets referring to the mujahideen.


A T-62M operating as a fortified gun position. Friend’s personal collection.

Following an order from the Minoboron in late 1979, the NII Stali had been busy at work on creating new composite armor for the modernized T-55 and T-62 tanks.
Work was quick as Uralvagonzavod was able to produce 2 of both tanks the following year with the composite armor as well as other improvements. As the T-62D was intended to massively increase the resilience of the tank, it was decided to put as much protection as possible while removing all the “expensive” equipment.


One of the modernized T-62s built in 1980, featuring turret composite armor and weight simulators on the hull.


The anti-HEAT rubber skirts would also be trialed in 1980.

This resulted in the creation of the object 166D, a tank that, funnily enough, was mostly meant to be “produced” in the many BTRZ. Most of the work was focused on improving the strength and rigidity of the floor armor and welds by adding additional 20 mm thick armor plates. The driver’s seat was also improved : as opposed to the original one being “fixed” to the floor, a new “suspended” seat was added adding additional space between the floor and the seat, making AT mines less lethal to the driver. On top of that, the first pair of torsion bars was also reinforced.

A T-62 in the process of having its floor reinforced.

In an attempt at making production quicker, the 12,7 mm antiair MG was omitted as well as the removal of the “expensive and complex” Volna FCS (including the KDT-1(-1)/KDT-2 LRF) that was later added on T-62Ms for tanks that would go through the “dushmanification” process. The T-62D also did not feature a thermal shroud unlike the T-62M.

“Production” of the 166D at an undisclosed BTRZ.

The “production” of the T-62D would later be superceded by the 166M when it finally entered service, with all its bells and whistles.

Fun fact : the composite armor was so well-received by the crews that they started using the composite blocks from damaged tanks on regular tanks, giving them a much better protection arc. However, the turret rotation mechanism wasn’t made to cope with such weight, prompting UVZ to develop more practical cage armor.

Specifications

Crew : 4

  • Driver
  • Gunner
  • Commander
  • Loader

Armament

  • One 115 mm U-5TS (Ammo : 40)
  • One 7.62 mm machine gun PKT
  • Sights : TShS-41U
  • Elevation : -5°/+16°

Dimensions

  • Weight : ~ 41 t
  • Length : 6.63 m
  • Width : 3.3 m
  • Height : 2.395 m (without MG)

Mobility

  • Engine : V-55U (580 hp)
  • Top speed : 51 km/h / -8 km/h
  • Transmission : 5 forward / 1 reverse

Armor

The tank shares the same armor as the T-62M-1 that is in game.

Sources

  • Техника и вооружение, n° 3/25
  • Техника и вооружение, n° 5/25
  • Основные боевые танки, Сафонов Б., Мураховский В., 1993.
  • Т-62. Убийца «Центурионов» и «Олифантов»
8 Likes

+1 don’t see why not

+1, but it would really need BR decompression, considering the T-62 is at 8.7 and the T-62M-1 is at 9.0

1 Like

I feel like no since it would just be padding where some isn’t needed unless its a squadron vehicle but i don’t think it justifies being one due to lack of any features of other squadron vehicles

Could always folder it

1 Like

Fun fact : the composite armor was so well-received by the crews that they started using the composite blocks from damaged tanks on regular tanks, giving them a much better protection arc. However, the turret rotation mechanism wasn’t made to cope with such weight, prompting UVZ to develop more practical cage armor.

The T-62 was upgraded with armor blocks installed on the sides of the turret. So it is not fully known whether this was an initiative on the ground or whether it is still a full-fledged factory modification of the tank. Although tests of the armor blocks installed in this way have established that they are ineffective and do not provide sufficient protection for the sides of the tower.

photo

image
image

Just make the t-62 go down to 8.3, it’s not like it’s much better than the t-55a

1 Like

Sources tend to indicate that it appeared first on the field and was made in low-level workshops of the OKSV. It was only submitted to actual “scientific” NIIBT tests in late 1985 alongside the T-62M with screens, T-62s with Kontakt-1, etc…

1 Like

Probably so. Most likely the source I used wasn’t totally accurate.

Sources are scarce. June 2025 TiV says that :

[…] установка двойных блоков дополнительной защиты на боковые поверхности башни Т-62 в Афганистане вызывала перегрузку механизма поворота башни и танка в целом. Поэтому специалисты В НИИ Стали в 1983-1984 гг. проработали различные варианты дополнительной защиты этих машин от кумулятивных гранат. Для оценки и определения оптимального варианта дополнительной защиты на Киевском БТРЗ с участием представителей ВНИИ Стали и УКБТМ переоборудовали четыре танка - два Т-62М и два Т-62. Первый вариант представлял собой Т-62М (№A04BT1310), оборудованный двойным комплектом навесных штатных броневых блоков на башне (по схеме, аналогичной предложенной войсковыми ремонтными подразделениями ОКСВ в ДРА). Масса каждого броневого блока составляла 550 кг.

2 Likes

There is another transitional prototype: Object 169 – A Rare Transitional T-62 Prototype

Object 169 was built in more than one example and I’d argue it is a much more logical addition compared to this tank.

Although it would be interesting to see a T-62 with extended Brezhnev’s eyebrows, I think it should come only after other T-62 and T-55 variants are added.

I’ve got like 6 pending:
T-55AMV
T-62MV (+2022 variant)
T-55M5
T-55M6
T-62M (2005)
T-62M (2021/22)

4 Likes

Is this the tank?


Does it get thermals and a new dart?

Yes. And yes. The 2022 version removes the Smoke and CITV, but adds additional ERA and slat protection.

yippee-happy

There is another interesting version of the T-62. It is called object 166TM. It has an 800-horsepower gas turbine engine and a 125-millimeter cannon with a loader like the one on the T-72.
image

2 Likes

9u69ledqlm091

I’m convinced that there will be enough soviet tanks (let alone any other ground vehicles) to ration through like 7 years of updates for the USSR

3 Likes

That’s why I am here XD

I’ll look forward to your future suggestions))

There’s also a bare T-62 that was equipped with the D-81 and AZ. I’d nearly finished the suggestion but somehow forgot about it and it disappeared. ))