There is no way they can keep this thing at 5.7.
Kids, its too OP for 5.7.
Doubtful it ever gets changed, but it needs to be sent up in BR to at least 6.3 because of the additional armor.
1 Like
buddy its T-34/85. the plates are 10mm of additional thickness on the side.
weak rage bait, do better.
8 Likes
4/10 ragebait, needs improvement
6 Likes
bot these nuts lmao got eem
3 Likes
its all funny, but I’m actually serious
Alr sure bro
2 Likes
hi serious, im dad
2 Likes
2 Likes
It’s a M4A3E8 without a stabilizer but more hull armor.
And of course you’re dehumanizing others…
Of course you’re in a German squadron.
3 Likes
lmao
and that bothers you
okay ill bite your bait.
what exactly does the extra armor do that would make it 6.3 BR material.
1 Like
its a tiger E with extra track armor that is very good at volumeming your shots, definetely not 5.7 wtf lol
1 Like
…and? what heat-fs shell would get stopped by that? mind you thats 10mm of structural steel, not rha
1 Like
yeah because these are the most common threat a 5.7 medium will face, lol.
anything shor of derp rounds would be stopped by the base model 34/85 anyway, and derp rounds will punch through no matter the extra armor.
but hey, by your logic, lets move Pzr IV H to 6.3 too, since it has spaced armor.
2 Likes
so??? show me an example in which this spaced armor would matter
1 Like
Are you really serious?
1 Like
You confusing a lot of things bro, quick reminder: this is STRUCTURAL ARMOR, 10mm of it.
This means that it is almost purely decorative and might only help against a round fires like 5 kms away
1 Like
can you just reply with an example? like an actual in game possible usecase for those screens
and whats so confusing about HEAT and HEAT-FS? its the same damn thing in game
its RHA equivalent is 4.5 mm lol