rarely? conventional ap/aphe needs to hit the weakspots usually and HEAT vehicles at that BR are pretty easy to deal with as most have awful soft stats. If I get uptiered I just assume the armor is unreliable (but still often works) like how you treat any heavy tank in an uptier
IS-2’s gun is worse than the T29’s gun so it’s not a great comparison
I find it quite enjoyable to play, the horizontal traverse and reverse speed are what save it from 6.7, also the fact that the T34 is at 6.7 already with no APHE
you say it like a T-29 dosn’t have to aim for weak points and deal with a longer reload then a tiger and have a huge gun barrel that everyone aims at to make the tank useless for 24 seconds + the re-reload if it gets damaged cause you know can’t load a gun if the mantle isn’t broken but the gun barrel is :/ and you also can’t say tiger has a hard time to find a weak point against the t-29 lower hull 100% gun mantle 90% of it top of turret 100% of it mg port 100% lower turret bounce shot 1000% then tiger 2 oh thats just both sides of the gun that can be fixed by glitching the game by turning left and right so your game can’t get target on the cheeks :/ and hit the barrel that dosn’t break cause of the sleeve.
no? I didn’t say that at all, T29 gun just has a faster reload than the IS-2 with enough APHE to overpressure almost anything
you’re just exaggerating how easy it is for the KT to kill the T29. That’s all, the weakspots are pretty easy to miss especially at range and you can hide them with bushes/terrain/concealment… I play both KT and T29 and they’re both excellent tanks.
really cause you looked up my over all kdr from when they added the kill counts to today… good work how about you show me your win ratio mines avg 64% with leader of 79% nothing to do with how well i play it’s how bad a tank is doing compared now get off your high horse… in the last 2-3 months i’ve been playing Italy doesn’t really give you that info dose it…
??? I literally complimented you by saying you do too well to have this opinion…
Are you the same guy who claimed I had a 2nd account that I was using to like my own posts when you didnt like what I was saying? when I was saying it politely even?
because it would be counting my time when i was playing 6+ years ago when it was 6.7 really how hard is that to compute… and i was with a decent squad that i’d play with to get scores like that… it’s like comparing super man(me) to an apple(avg player) new tanks that have been added since then are stronger and more agile like, no1 used a t92 cause it was trash now it’s bis only took 4-5 years, m56 was beast then 3-4 years it turned into a joke, mbt-70 out leagued everything now it’s a also a joke of a tank how dose showing stats for my whole carrier change anything it doesn’t…
I think most heavy tanks past 6.7 start to struggle. The issue really has to do with balancing. If brought to a lower br, it’ll make the T34 obsolete. It’s very similar to why the Tiger 2p and the 2h are the same br though one is objectively better. Having the Tiger 2p at 6.3 made most heavy tanks below the BR obsolete.
I personally dislike the 7.0-8.0 br bracket for US because most nations are transitioning to newer rounds and lighter tanks. So a lot of medium and heavy tanks don’t cut it or feeling boring. The T92 is one of my favorite tanks because it’s very agile and carries heat.