Multiple “reputable” sources everyone of you guys is sth saying sth different
Reasons many dont believe russian sources
And its not finished from everything i heared its still in development specialy because it cant be focused on.
And what would make your “sources” better then the others?
That’s wrong we are litteraly getting the first next year.
Even better, production already starting and surpassimg T-14
What Russian source ? or random News Channel (mostly EU/Ukraine) in English claim he heard it from a very poor translated article ?
Even in their own source mentioned that freaking state
Spoiler
It’s the same way with some poor translated German docs/Article being fixed all the times.
And bruh, after looking back, i laugh at my self when compare T-14 to 2A8, it should be compared to KF-51 but that thing is no where close in the state of production like T-14. One step ahead compare to Abrams X but no where close to T-14.
6 Likes
Again, you are not listening because you feel attacked. I never claimed any sources.
I quoted the guy who said it multiple times.
Its sources from the russians to each other that dont make sense
I never claimed that, the leo 2 arc 3 is closer in capabilitied yes
You are the one that brought up the 2a8 and production numbers not me
You literaly make no sense and are constantly contradicting yourself.
I have made no claims about the production of the T-14, i said you dont even realy know yourself
Neither did i state the 2a8 is capability wise equal to the T-14. I denied your accusation that we are further building 2a7s instead of 2a8s thats it.
Seriously get your head out of the sand and actualy read what i and others wrote.
And stop making false claims
2 Likes
And you running around call us belive in propaganda
2 Likes
Guys, maybe enough is enough? I swear, the circling around because Mekboy cant leave it be and you, Shini, continue circling back to a single user is getting annoying and contribute nothing to the thread besides “Look at Germans” (even if it better than endless whining of American mains and their incorrectly protected Babrams, This at least have some relevance to the topic at hand)
Buddy, a russian statet the stuff not me
I am not claiming any information
Meaning i am not influenced by propaganda or anything.
1 Like
I am not even the one that brought up german tanks in this case, thats the big joke
Jokes on you, could do the same about leopards, but thats is not why i am here
I am confused.
Why would one compare the state of a vehicle revealed 9 years ago to one revealed 2 years ago?
Like the CV-90-105/120, the T-14 Armata is one of many promising vehicle designs over the years that didn’t garner that much interest from customers.
Edit:
Anyways +1 for the game assuming one can have reasonable certainty for the armor profile for the vehicle.
1 Like
I know that the T-14 is produced, but in small quantities.
1 Like
That’s why i laughed at my self, from the designation and the way the project undergoing, KF51 is more suitable to compare to the T-14 instead of 2A8
2A8 is the same weight with the new version of T-80 Russia planning to produce after clear out the old T-80’s hull for T-80BVM.
The difference is that the 2A8 uses a manned turret, if You wanna compare it to something functional and with a crewless turret in a similar style to the T-14 the leopard 2 ARC 3.0 it’s completely functional from top to bottom
3 Likes
Strv 123A will be possible in the future, there are multiple more modern alternative versions of the CV90120, and a wide variety of more capable CV90 models. That’s without mentioning the possibility of getting modern Danish and Norwegian tanks
oh wow, in x years sweden finaly gets a 2a7v. will only need minimum another 2 years and then implementation another year
did you read how i said no mbts? Lights are all nice, but at the end of the day they are support vehicles for a reason. The main vehicles in this game are the mbts not lights and dont get close to their capabilities
which are relagated to only premium/event/squadron as of right now
Current fact is for at least another 1-2years sweden is dead, there is nothing particulary big that can be added to sweden to make them stronger
They have been putting Nakidka on vehicles since 1999 trying to sell more and more to army.
Yeah I noticed that with my T-72B3 obr. 2016 (Arena-M)/T-72B3A suggestion. I didn’t know much about the tarp but then got google slammed about it when I looked it up for the suggestion.
Funny, Russia build more T14’s since 2014 than Germany has Leopard 2a7’s in total
1 Like
