It’s still the radar prior to 26 like you said. They have been mounted for development reasons
Mk1.
Provude source pls
I read through it using a translator. In short, it says everywhere that the radar has just been built but still requires testing, and that it is only going to be installed on Eurofighters in the future. That doesn’t contradict what I was saying
1 Like
You have a bad translator. Literally states it’s using the radar for future use and integration into the T4.
The IPA series of aircrafts are for development they use stuff normal Eurofighters don’t see German Eurofighters with irst or storm shadow or in this case have the radar mounted to develop it farther
I see—so now it’s the translator’s fault. Okay. I don’t see any point in continuing this conversation
If you guys want a Mk.1 flown on a Typhoon Spanish Eurofighter makes first flight with AESA radar installed - FlightGlobal
Oh god another pay wall
Ok, take one without, if the thing seen without paywall was not enough.
2 Likes
How was the Spanish development aircraft trusted more then the German 🥀
Well this post is clearly ragebait I think it can be closed
so what you’re saying is your 11.7 t-80 have no chance against a single vehicle with the A3 round.
how effective is K5 against any top tier round?
All USSR tier 8 MBT’s have Relict in some form or another. when only a single round gets its anti ERA tip, the whole house crumbles. Most if not all top tier NATO rounds should have some type of anti ERA capability, because that is what they were designed to combat.
Meanwhile, Russia with the best of everything doing just as bad as Germany.
Russian win rates are trash unless they have completely absolutely broken vehicles to abuse.
2 Likes
“russia needs more overpwered stuff becuase bad players keep losing and dropping the winrate”
1 Like
except MBTs.
(No, I’m not saying Gaijin should add the T-14)
1 Like
but top-tier with USSR looks like this.
4. 4 vehicles .
only 3 MBT.
They all look like that to an Abrams firing the A3 round.
I even gave myself a handicap by setting the range to 900m, given that the average combat range in the game is around 600m.
I can’t really say anything about that. I’ve only looked into the matter briefly, and it seems like no one other than the US has really focused on it
More or less, yes. Because while it used to have the advantage of at least some armor, that’s gone now. What you’re left with is: poor gun depression, slow aiming speed, average reload time, a lack of survivability, and one of the worst-penetrating shells at its rank. The only ones worse off are the French Leclercs
Upd: I only noticed later that you were talking about Tier 8, but that doesn’t really change the situation. Only three tanks have Relikt armor on the upper glacis
2 Likes
Having slightly worst MBTs while having the best of everything else doesn’t really add up to having just as bad as wind rate as Germany though.
Just gonna link back to my own 3 ground suggestions for how to help Russian Top Tier win rates without breaking the game.
The T-90M2 has the T-14’s mobility, and the T-80UE-2 has Relikt armor. The T-80UA would be a useful vehicle to bridge between the T-80U and the T-80BVM.
Russia win rates low: omg its cos the players suck
US win rates low: omg its cos cos the vehicles suck
I know youre a us main without even booting up the game lmfao
3 Likes